Ledger W J
Am J Med. 1986 Jun 30;80(6B):216-21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90504-8.
Aminoglycosides have always had a major role in the treatment of gynecologic infections. This therapeutic emphasis has been based upon the bactericidal activity of the aminoglycosides against gram-negative aerobes. This group of organisms is important to the gynecologist because of their frequent isolation from soft tissue, urinary sites, and the bloodstream in women with nosocomial or community-acquired pelvic infections. In the past decade, there has been increasing clinical awareness of the multi-bacterial nature of these soft tissue pelvic infections. A major therapeutic change directed against gram-negative anaerobes has been the substitution of more effective agents like clindamycin or metronidazole for the penicillin arm of the older penicillin-aminoglycoside combination. The majority of intra-abdominal and pelvic infections treated by gynecologists occur in patients who are younger and usually healthier than those with similar infections who are treated by general surgeons. Consequently, in many instances, single drug therapy with a cephalosporin (usually cefoxitin) is adequate, if combined with surgical drainage when indicated. However, there is an increasingly larger group of patients who are significantly older and who may also have pelvic malignancies. In addition, they may be immunocompromised. Infections in this group mandate the use of the most effective antimicrobial agents that will cover the broadest spectrum. When anaerobic bacteria are involved, either clindamycin or metronidazole are acceptable choices; for aerobic gram-negative organisms, an aminoglycoside should be used. Recent studies suggest that amikacin may be the best choice, since it is associated with a low level of bacterial resistance and has been shown to reduce levels of resistance to other aminoglycosides. Amikacin has become the "gold standard" for comparisons with any new cephalosporins or penicillins. New developments will modify the use of aminoglycosides in the future. The expansion of oncology care with immune-system-modifying chemotherapy and radiation will expose patients to the dangers of gram-negative sepsis. Aminoglycosides are a logical part of the initial therapeutic regimen for these septic patients. On the other hand, the majority of gynecologic patients with pelvic infections are young and healthy. Recent studies have demonstrated that as many as 40 percent of these women will be underdosed by standard treatment regimens based upon ideal body weight. This means that patients receiving aminoglycosides will require monitoring of peak and trough levels to insure therapeutic drug levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
氨基糖苷类药物在妇科感染治疗中一直发挥着重要作用。这种治疗重点基于氨基糖苷类药物对革兰氏阴性需氧菌的杀菌活性。这类微生物对妇科医生来说很重要,因为在患有医院获得性或社区获得性盆腔感染的女性中,它们经常从软组织、泌尿道部位及血液中分离出来。在过去十年中,临床对这些软组织盆腔感染的多菌性质的认识不断提高。针对革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的一项主要治疗变化是,用克林霉素或甲硝唑等更有效的药物替代了较老的青霉素 - 氨基糖苷类联合用药中的青霉素成分。妇科医生治疗的大多数腹腔内和盆腔感染患者比普通外科医生治疗的类似感染患者更年轻且通常更健康。因此,在许多情况下,如果在必要时结合手术引流,单用头孢菌素(通常是头孢西丁)治疗就足够了。然而,有越来越多的患者年龄较大,可能还患有盆腔恶性肿瘤。此外,他们可能免疫功能低下。这类患者的感染需要使用能覆盖最广谱范围的最有效的抗菌药物。当涉及厌氧菌时,克林霉素或甲硝唑都是可接受的选择;对于需氧革兰氏阴性菌,应使用氨基糖苷类药物。最近的研究表明,阿米卡星可能是最佳选择,因为它与低水平的细菌耐药性相关,并且已被证明能降低对其他氨基糖苷类药物的耐药水平。阿米卡星已成为与任何新头孢菌素或青霉素进行比较的“金标准”。新的进展将在未来改变氨基糖苷类药物的使用方式。随着免疫调节化疗和放疗的肿瘤护理范围扩大,患者将面临革兰氏阴性败血症的风险。氨基糖苷类药物是这些败血症患者初始治疗方案的合理组成部分。另一方面,大多数患有盆腔感染的妇科患者年轻且健康。最近的研究表明,多达40%的这类女性按照基于理想体重的标准治疗方案用药剂量不足。这意味着接受氨基糖苷类药物治疗的患者需要监测峰浓度和谷浓度水平,以确保达到治疗药物水平。(摘要截取自400字)