Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉支架植入术后冠状动脉旁路移植术的随访和结果。

Follow-Up and Outcome after Coronary Bypass Surgery Preceded by Coronary Stent Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;72(6):423-434. doi: 10.1055/a-2107-0481. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on myocardial revascularization define recommendations for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Only little information exists on long-term follow-up and quality of life (QoL) after CABG preceded by PCI. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prior PCI on outcome and QoL in patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent CABG.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, CABG patients were divided in: CABG preceded by PCI: PCI-first (PCF), and CABG-only (CO) groups. The PCF group was further divided in guideline-conform (GCO) and guideline nonconform (GNC) subgroups, according to the SYNTAX score (2014 European Society of Cardiology [ESC]/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery [EACTS] guidelines). Thirty days mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and QoL using the European Quality-of-Life-5 Dimensions were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 997 patients were analyzed, of which 784 underwent CABG without (CO), and 213 individuals with prior PCI (PCF). The latter group consisted of 67 patients being treated in accordance (GCO), and 24 in discordance (GNC) to the 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines. Reinfarction (PCF: 3.8% vs. CO: 1.0%;  = 0.024), re-angiography (PCF: 17.6% vs. CO: 9.0%;  = 0.004), and re-PCI (PCF: 10.4% vs. CO: 3.0%;  < 0.001) were observed more frequently in PCF patients. Also, patients reported better health status in the CO compared to PCF group (CO: 72.48 ± 19.31 vs. PCF: 68.20 ± 17.86;  = 0.01). Patients from the guideline nonconform subgroup reported poorer health status compared to the guideline-conform group (GNC: 64.23 ± 14.56 vs. GCO: 73.42 ± 17.66;  = 0.041) and were more likely to require re-PCI (GNC: 18.8% vs. GCO: 2.4%;  = 0.03). Also, GNC patients were more likely to have left main stenosis (GCO: 19.7% vs. GNC: 37.5%;  < 0.001) and showed higher preinterventional SYNTAX score (GCO: 18.63 ± 9.81 vs. GNC: 26.67 ± 5.07;  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PCI preceding CABG is associated with poorer outcomes such as reinfarction, re-angiography, and re-PCI, but also worse health status and higher rehospitalization. Nevertheless, results were better when PCI was guideline-conformant. This data should impact the Heart Team decision.

摘要

背景

心肌血运重建指南定义了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的推荐治疗方案。然而,关于 PCI 预处理后行 CABG 的长期随访和生活质量(QoL)的数据却很少。我们的研究旨在评估 PCI 预处理对稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者行 CABG 后结局和 QoL 的影响。

方法

在我们的回顾性研究中,将 CABG 患者分为:PCI 预处理的 CABG(PCI 预处理组):PCI 预处理(PCF)组和单纯 CABG(CO)组。PCF 组根据 SYNTAX 评分(2014 年欧洲心脏病学会[ESC]/欧洲心胸外科学会[EACTS]指南)进一步分为指南一致(GCO)和指南不一致(GNC)亚组。评估 30 天死亡率、主要不良心脏事件和欧洲生命质量 5 维问卷(EQ-5D)的 QoL。

结果

共分析了 997 例患者,其中 784 例患者行单纯 CABG(CO),213 例患者行 PCI 预处理(PCF)。PCF 组中 67 例患者接受了与指南一致的治疗(GCO),24 例患者与指南不一致(GNC)。PCF 组患者的再梗死(PCF:3.8% vs. CO:1.0%;  = 0.024)、再血管造影(PCF:17.6% vs. CO:9.0%;  = 0.004)和再 PCI(PCF:10.4% vs. CO:3.0%;  < 0.001)发生率更高。此外,CO 组患者报告的健康状况优于 PCF 组(CO:72.48 ± 19.31 vs. PCF:68.20 ± 17.86;  = 0.01)。与 GCO 组相比,GNC 组患者报告的健康状况较差(GNC:64.23 ± 14.56 vs. GCO:73.42 ± 17.66;  = 0.041),且更有可能需要再次行 PCI(GNC:18.8% vs. GCO:2.4%;  = 0.03)。此外,GNC 组患者更易出现左主干狭窄(GCO:19.7% vs. GNC:37.5%;  < 0.001),且术前 SYNTAX 评分更高(GCO:18.63 ± 9.81 vs. GNC:26.67 ± 5.07;  < 0.001)。

结论

PCI 预处理 CABG 与再梗死、再血管造影和再 PCI 等不良预后相关,但也与较差的健康状况和更高的再住院率相关。然而,当 PCI 符合指南时,结果会更好。这些数据应该会影响心脏团队的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f9a/11379534/b0bee98c77ad/10-1055-a-2107-0481-i0220236826oc-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验