Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、冠状动脉旁路移植术和 SYNTAX 评分:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the SYNTAX score: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, P. R. China.

Department of Internal Medicine, EALING Hospital, University of Buckingham, Uxbridge road, Southall, UB1 3HW, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 2;7:43801. doi: 10.1038/srep43801.

Abstract

The SYNTAX [Synergy Between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) With Taxus and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)] score is a decision-making tool in interventional cardiology. However, several facts still remain to be addressed: What about PCI or CABG with a low versus a high score respectively? And what about PCI with a low score versus CABG with a high score? Electronic databases were carefully searched for relevant publications. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and the analysis was carried out by RevMan 5.3. Eleven studies with a total number of 11,037 patients were included. In terms of clinical outcomes, this analysis showed PCI to have significantly favored patients with a low versus a high SYNTAX score. In patients who were re-vascularized by CABG, mortality and major adverse cardiac events were significantly lower with a low SYNTAX score. However, when PCI with a low SYNTAX score was compared with CABG with a high SYNTAX score, no significant difference in mortality and combined death/stroke/myocardial infarction were observed. In conclusion, the SYNTAX score might be considered useful in interventional cardiology. Nevertheless, the fact that it has limitations when compared to newer tools should also not be ignored.

摘要

SYNTAX 评分是介入心脏病学中的一种决策工具。然而,仍有几个事实需要解决:SYNTAX 评分低的 PCI 与 SYNTAX 评分高的 CABG 相比如何?SYNTAX 评分低的 PCI 与 SYNTAX 评分高的 CABG 相比如何?我们仔细搜索了电子数据库以寻找相关出版物。使用 RevMan 5.3 计算了比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),并进行了分析。共纳入了 11 项研究,总计 11037 例患者。就临床结果而言,该分析表明 SYNTAX 评分低的患者进行 PCI 治疗具有显著优势。在接受 CABG 血运重建的患者中,SYNTAX 评分低的患者死亡率和主要不良心脏事件显著降低。然而,当比较 SYNTAX 评分低的 PCI 与 SYNTAX 评分高的 CABG 时,死亡率和死亡/卒中/心肌梗死复合终点无显著差异。总之,SYNTAX 评分可能在介入心脏病学中具有一定的应用价值。然而,也不应忽视与较新工具相比其具有局限性的事实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c147/5333134/c67472e7db12/srep43801-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验