Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002368.
In surgery, serious adverse events have effects on the patient journey, the patient outcome and may constitute a burden to the surgeon involved. This study aims to investigate facilitators and barriers to transparency around, reporting of and learning from serious adverse events among surgeons.
Based on a qualitative study design, we recruited 15 surgeons (4 females and 11 males) with 4 different surgical subspecialties from four Norwegian university hospitals. The participants underwent individual semistructured interviews and data were analysed according to principles of inductive qualitative content analysis.
We identified four overarching themes. All surgeons reported having experienced serious adverse events, describing these as part of 'the nature of surgery'. Most surgeons reported that established strategies failed to combine facilitation of learning with taking care of the involved surgeons. Transparency about serious adverse events was by some felt as an extra burden, fearing that openness on technical-related errors could affect their future career negatively. Positive implications of transparency were linked with factors such as minimising the surgeon's feeling of personal burden with positive impact on individual and collective learning. A lack of facilitation of individual and structural transparency factors could entail 'collateral damage'. Our participants suggested that both the younger generation of surgeons in general, and the increasing number of women in surgical professions, might contribute to 'maturing' the culture of transparency.
This study suggests that transparency associated with serious adverse events is hampered by concerns at both personal and professional levels among surgeons. These results emphasise the importance of improved systemic learning and the need for structural changes; it is crucial to increase the focus on education and training curriculums and offer advice on coping strategies and establish arenas for safe discussions after serious adverse events.
在外科手术中,严重不良事件会影响患者的治疗进程、治疗结果,并且可能会给相关外科医生带来负担。本研究旨在调查外科医生在严重不良事件报告、学习透明化方面的促进因素和障碍。
本研究基于定性研究设计,从挪威四家大学医院的四个不同外科专科招募了 15 名外科医生(4 名女性和 11 名男性)作为参与者。参与者接受了个体半结构化访谈,数据按照归纳定性内容分析的原则进行分析。
我们确定了四个总体主题。所有外科医生都报告曾经历过严重不良事件,将其描述为“外科手术的本质”的一部分。大多数外科医生报告说,既定的策略未能将促进学习与照顾相关外科医生结合起来。一些外科医生认为严重不良事件的透明度是额外的负担,担心公开与技术相关的错误会对他们未来的职业生涯产生负面影响。透明度的积极影响与一些因素有关,例如减轻外科医生的个人负担,对个人和集体学习产生积极影响。个人和结构透明度因素的缺乏促进作用可能会导致“附带损害”。我们的参与者建议,一般来说,年轻一代的外科医生,以及外科专业中越来越多的女性,可能会促进透明度文化的“成熟”。
本研究表明,外科医生在个人和职业层面都对严重不良事件相关的透明度存在担忧,这对透明度造成了阻碍。这些结果强调了系统学习改进和结构变革的重要性;必须更加关注教育和培训课程,提供应对策略建议,并为严重不良事件后建立安全的讨论场所。