• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of Seizures While Driving Prior to Diagnosis in People With Focal Epilepsy: Motor Vehicle Accidents and Time to Diagnosis.癫痫患者诊断前驾车时发作的影响:机动车事故和诊断时间。
Neurology. 2023 Sep 26;101(13):e1370-e1375. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207464. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Focal nonmotor versus motor seizures: The impact on diagnostic delay in focal epilepsy.局灶性非运动性与运动性发作:对局灶性癫痫诊断延迟的影响。
Epilepsia. 2020 Dec;61(12):2643-2652. doi: 10.1111/epi.16707. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
The Impact of Clinical Seizure Characteristics on Recognition and Treatment of New-onset Focal Epilepsy in Emergency Departments.临床发作特征对急诊科新发局灶性癫痫识别和治疗的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;28(4):412-420. doi: 10.1111/acem.14114. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
Unrecognized Focal Nonmotor Seizures in Adolescents Presenting to Emergency Departments.青少年在急诊科就诊时出现未识别的局灶性非运动性发作。
Neurology. 2024 May;102(10):e209389. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209389. Epub 2024 May 1.
5
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
6
Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.奥卡西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 23;10(10):CD003615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003615.pub4.
7
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯巴比妥单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 24;10(10):CD001904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001904.pub4.
8
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 24;6(6):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub3.
9
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
10
Generalized onset seizures with focal evolution (GOFE) - A unique seizure type in the setting of generalized epilepsy.伴有局灶性演变的全面性发作(GOFE)——全面性癫痫中的一种独特发作类型。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Jan;54:20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the Impact of Seizures While Driving: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Type, Frequency, and Consequences in People With Epilepsy Prior to Diagnosis.揭示癫痫发作对驾驶的影响:一项关于癫痫诊断前患者发作类型、频率及后果的回顾性队列研究。
Epilepsy Curr. 2024 Apr 23;24(5):329-330. doi: 10.1177/15357597231218084. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Delay in Epilepsy: the Scope of the Problem.癫痫的诊断延误:问题的范围。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Nov 24;21(12):71. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01161-8.
2
Focal nonmotor versus motor seizures: The impact on diagnostic delay in focal epilepsy.局灶性非运动性与运动性发作:对局灶性癫痫诊断延迟的影响。
Epilepsia. 2020 Dec;61(12):2643-2652. doi: 10.1111/epi.16707. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
Assessment and effect of a gap between new-onset epilepsy diagnosis and treatment in the US.美国新诊断癫痫与治疗之间差距的评估和影响。
Neurology. 2019 May 7;92(19):e2197-e2208. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007448. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies.癫痫的患病率和发病率:国际研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):296-303. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003509. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
5
Driving and Epilepsy: a Review of Important Issues.驾驶与癫痫:重要问题综述。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):80. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0677-y.
6
The effect of recurrent seizures on cognitive, behavioral, and quality-of-life outcomes after 12 months of monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed or previously untreated partial epilepsy.新诊断或既往未治疗的部分性癫痫成人患者单药治疗12个月后,复发性癫痫发作对认知、行为及生活质量结局的影响。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Dec;53:202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Mind the gap: Multiple events and lengthy delays before presentation with a "first seizure".注意间隙:多次事件和长时间延迟,然后出现“首次癫痫发作”。
Epilepsia. 2015 Oct;56(10):1534-41. doi: 10.1111/epi.13127. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
8
Epilepsy-related clinical characteristics and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癫痫相关临床特征与死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurology. 2014 Nov 18;83(21):1968-77. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001005. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Healthcare utilization and costs in adults with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy.成年人稳定且未控制的癫痫的医疗利用和费用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Feb;31:356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
The lifelong course of chronic epilepsy: the Chalfont experience.慢性癫痫的终身病程:Chalfont 经验。
Brain. 2013 Oct;136(Pt 10):3187-99. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt117. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

癫痫患者诊断前驾车时发作的影响:机动车事故和诊断时间。

Impact of Seizures While Driving Prior to Diagnosis in People With Focal Epilepsy: Motor Vehicle Accidents and Time to Diagnosis.

机构信息

From the Tulane University Undergraduate School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine (B.B.), New Orleans, LA; Monash University School of Medicine (S.B.), Clayton, Australia; Department of Neurology (J.A.F.), NYU Langone Health, New York; and Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.

出版信息

Neurology. 2023 Sep 26;101(13):e1370-e1375. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207464. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207464
PMID:37286361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10558166/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the type, frequency, and consequences of seizures while driving (SzWD) in people with epilepsy before diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) to identify prediagnostic SzWD. Clinical descriptions from seizure diaries and medical records were used to classify seizure types and frequencies, time to diagnosis, and SzWD outcomes. Data were modeled using multiple logistic regression to assess for factors independently associated with SzWD.

RESULTS

32 prediagnostic SzWD were reported among 23/447 (5.1%) participants. Of them, 7 (30.4%) had more than 1. Six participants (26.1%) experienced SzWD as their first lifetime seizure. Most SzWD were focal with impaired awareness (n = 27, 84.4%). Of participants who had motor vehicle accidents (MVAs), 6 (42.9%) had no recollection. SzWD led to hospitalization in 11 people. The median time from first seizure to first SzWD was 304 days (IQR = 0-4,056 days). The median time between first SzWD and diagnosis was 64 days (IQR = 10-176.5 days). Employment was associated with a 3.95-fold increased risk of SzWD (95% CI 1.2-13.2, = 0.03), and nonmotor seizures were associated with a 4.79-fold increased risk (95% CI 1.3-17.6, = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

This study identifies the consequences of seizure-related MVAs and hospitalizations people experience before epilepsy diagnosis. This highlights the need for further research aimed at improving seizure awareness and improving time to diagnosis.

摘要

目的

在癫痫诊断前,确定癫痫患者驾驶时发作(SzWD)的类型、频率和后果。

方法

我们使用人类癫痫项目(HEP)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定诊断前的 SzWD。使用发作日记和病历中的临床描述来对发作类型和频率、诊断时间和 SzWD 结果进行分类。使用多逻辑回归模型评估与 SzWD 独立相关的因素。

结果

在 447 名参与者中的 23 名(5.1%)报告了 32 例诊断前 SzWD。其中,7 例(30.4%)超过 1 例。6 名参与者(26.1%)首次出现终身发作即为 SzWD。大多数 SzWD 为局灶性伴意识障碍(n = 27,84.4%)。在发生机动车事故(MVA)的参与者中,有 6 人(42.9%)无记忆。SzWD 导致 11 人住院。从首次发作到首次 SzWD 的中位时间为 304 天(IQR = 0-4056 天)。从首次 SzWD 到诊断的中位时间为 64 天(IQR = 10-176.5 天)。就业与 SzWD 的风险增加 3.95 倍相关(95%CI 1.2-13.2,=0.03),非运动性发作与风险增加 4.79 倍相关(95%CI 1.3-17.6,=0.02)。

讨论

本研究确定了癫痫诊断前人们经历的与发作相关的 MVA 和住院的后果。这突出表明需要进一步研究,旨在提高对发作的认识和缩短诊断时间。