From the Department of Neurology (N.J.), NYU Langone Health, New York; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (M.F.) and Neurology (H.T.G., J.F.), NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Departments of Neurology (J.P.) and Pediatrics and Neurology (K.L.P.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; Department of Neurology (D.J.D.), Children's' Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; and Department of Neurology (L.L.T.), Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Neurology. 2024 May;102(10):e209389. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209389. Epub 2024 May 1.
Many adolescents with undiagnosed focal epilepsy seek evaluation in emergency departments (EDs). Accurate history-taking is essential to prompt diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we investigated ED recognition of motor vs nonmotor seizures and its effect on management and treatment of focal epilepsy in adolescents.
This was a retrospective analysis of enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP), an international multi-institutional study that collected data from 34 sites between 2012 and 2017. Participants were 12 years or older, neurotypical, and within 4 months of treatment initiation for focal epilepsy. We used HEP enrollment medical records to review participants' initial diagnosis and management.
A total of 83 adolescents were enrolled between 12 and 18 years. Fifty-eight (70%) presented to an ED before diagnosis of epilepsy. Although most ED presentations were for motor seizures (n = 52; 90%), many patients had a history of nonmotor seizures (20/52 or 38%). Adolescents with initial nonmotor seizures were less likely to present to EDs (26/44 or 59% vs 32/39 or 82%, = 0.02), and nonmotor seizures were less likely to be correctly identified (2/6 or 33% vs 42/52 or 81%, = 0.008). A history of initial nonmotor seizures was not recognized in any adolescent who presented for a first-lifetime motor seizure. As a result, initiation of treatment and admission from the ED was not more likely for these adolescents who met the definition of epilepsy compared with those with no seizure history. This lack of nonmotor seizure history recognition in the ED was greater than that observed in the adult group (0% vs 23%, = 0.03) and occurred in both pediatric and nonpediatric ED settings.
Our study supports growing evidence that nonmotor seizures are often undiagnosed, with many individuals coming to attention only after conversion to motor seizures. We found this treatment gap is exacerbated in the adolescent population. Our study highlights a critical need for physicians to inquire about the symptoms of nonmotor seizures, even when the presenting seizure is motor. Future interventions should focus on improving nonmotor seizure recognition for this population in EDs.
许多患有未确诊局灶性癫痫的青少年会到急诊科(ED)就诊。准确的病史采集对于及时诊断和治疗至关重要。在这项研究中,我们调查了 ED 对运动性发作与非运动性发作的识别能力,及其对青少年局灶性癫痫治疗管理的影响。
这是一项回顾性分析,纳入了 2012 年至 2017 年间,来自国际多机构 Human Epilepsy Project(HEP)的登记数据。参与者年龄在 12 岁及以上,神经认知正常,且在局灶性癫痫发作后 4 个月内开始治疗。我们使用 HEP 登记的病历来回顾参与者的初始诊断和管理。
共有 83 名 12 至 18 岁的青少年入组。58 名(70%)在癫痫诊断前曾到 ED 就诊。尽管大多数 ED 就诊表现为运动性发作(n=52;90%),但许多患者有非运动性发作史(20/52 或 38%)。最初有非运动性发作的青少年更不可能到 ED 就诊(26/44 或 59%与 32/39 或 82%, = 0.02),而且非运动性发作更不可能被正确识别(2/6 或 33%与 42/52 或 81%, = 0.008)。在首次发作表现为局灶性癫痫的青少年中,均未识别出有初始非运动性发作史。因此,与无癫痫发作史的青少年相比,这些符合癫痫定义的青少年在 ED 中接受治疗和入院的可能性并没有更高。这种在 ED 中未能识别非运动性发作史的情况比在成年组中更为严重(0%与 23%, = 0.03),且发生在儿科和非儿科 ED 环境中。
我们的研究支持越来越多的证据表明,非运动性发作常常未被诊断,许多患者只有在转为运动性发作后才被注意到。我们发现,这种治疗差距在青少年人群中更为严重。我们的研究强调了医生需要询问非运动性发作症状的迫切需求,即使首发发作是运动性的。未来的干预措施应侧重于改善 ED 中该人群对非运动性发作的识别能力。