Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 7;13(1):9237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35891-1.
Kidney cancer is a common urologic malignancy with either laparoscopic (LPN) or robotic partial nephrectomy as therapeutic options of choice for localized tumors. However, renal resection and suturing are challenging steps of the procedure that can lead to complications such as prolonged warm ischemia, bleeding, and urinary fistulas. LPN with a diode laser is an efficient technique due to its cutting and/or coagulation attributes. Surprisingly, key laser features such as wavelength and power remain undefined. Using a large porcine model, we evaluated the laser range of wavelength and power in a clamp-free LPN and compared it to the established gold-standard LPN technique (i.e., cold-cutting and suturing). By analyzing surgery duration, bleeding, presence of urine leak, tissue damage related to the resected renal fragment and the remaining organ, hemoglobin levels, and renal function, we show that an optimized experimental diode laser clamp-free LPN (wavelength, 980 nm; power, 15 W) had shorter surgery time with less bleeding, and better postoperative renal function recovery when compared to the well-established technique. Together, our data indicate that partial nephrectomy with a diode laser clamp-free LPN technique is an improved alternative to the gold-standard technique. Therefore, translational clinical trials towards human patient applications are readily feasible.
肾细胞癌是一种常见的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤,对于局限性肿瘤,腹腔镜(LPN)或机器人辅助部分肾切除术是首选的治疗方法。然而,肾脏切除和缝合是该手术的挑战性步骤,可能导致并发症,如长时间的热缺血、出血和尿瘘。二极管激光辅助 LPN 由于其切割和/或凝固特性,是一种有效的技术。令人惊讶的是,关键的激光特性,如波长和功率,仍然没有定义。本研究使用大型猪模型,在无夹闭的 LPN 中评估了激光的波长和功率范围,并将其与既定的金标准 LPN 技术(即冷切割和缝合)进行了比较。通过分析手术时间、出血、尿漏的存在、切除的肾段组织和剩余器官的损伤、血红蛋白水平和肾功能,我们表明,与既定技术相比,优化的实验性二极管激光无夹闭 LPN(波长 980nm,功率 15W)具有更短的手术时间、更少的出血和更好的术后肾功能恢复。总之,我们的数据表明,二极管激光无夹闭 LPN 技术的部分肾切除术是金标准技术的一种改进选择。因此,向人类患者应用的转化临床试验是可行的。