Department of Health Sciences Education, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.
Centre for Community-Based Health Professions Education, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04416-9.
The effectiveness of peer learning has been recognized and discussed by many scholars, and implemented in the formal curriculums of medical schools internationally. However, there is a general dearth of studies in measuring the objective outcomes in learning.
We investigated the objective effect of near-peer learning on tutee's emotions and its equivalence within the formal curriculum of a clinical reasoning Problem Based Learning session in a Japanese medical school. Fourth-year medical students were assigned to the group tutored by 6-year students or by faculties. The positive activating emotion, positive deactivating emotion, negative activating emotion, negative deactivating emotion, Neutral emotion were measured using the Japanese version of the Medical Emotion Scale (J-MES), and self-efficacy scores were also assessed. We calculated the mean differences of these variables between the faculty and the peer tutor groups and were statistically analyzed the equivalence of these scores. The equivalence margin was defined as a score of 0.4 for J-MES and 10.0 for the self-efficacy score, respectively.
Of the 143 eligible participant students, 90 were allocated to the peer tutor group and 53 were allocated to the faculty group. There was no significant difference between the groups. The 95% confidence interval of the mean score difference for positive activating emotions (-0.22 to 0.15), positive deactivating emotions (-0.35 to 0.18), negative activating emotions (-0.20 to 0.22), negative deactivating emotions (-0.20 to 0.23), and self-efficacy (-6.83 to 5.04) were withing the predetermined equivalence margins for emotion scores, meaning that equivalence was confirmed for these variables.
Emotional outcomes were equivalent between near-peer PBL sessions and faculty-led sessions. This comparative measurement of the emotional outcomes in near-peer learning contributes to understanding PBL in the field of medical education.
同伴学习的有效性已经被许多学者所认可和讨论,并在国际医学院校的正式课程中实施。然而,在衡量学习的客观结果方面,普遍缺乏研究。
我们研究了近伴学习对被辅导者情绪的客观影响,以及它在日本医学院临床推理基于问题的学习课程正式课程中的等效性。四年级医学生被分配到由 6 年级学生或教师辅导的小组。使用日本版医学情绪量表(J-MES)测量积极激活情绪、积极去激活情绪、消极激活情绪、消极去激活情绪和中性情绪,同时评估自我效能感得分。我们计算了这些变量在教师组和同伴导师组之间的平均值差异,并对这些分数的等效性进行了统计分析。等效性边界定义为 J-MES 的 0.4 分和自我效能感得分的 10.0 分。
在 143 名符合条件的参与学生中,90 名被分配到同伴导师组,53 名被分配到教师组。两组之间没有显著差异。积极激活情绪(-0.22 至 0.15)、积极去激活情绪(-0.35 至 0.18)、消极激活情绪(-0.20 至 0.22)、消极去激活情绪(-0.20 至 0.23)和自我效能感(-6.83 至 5.04)的平均值差异的 95%置信区间均在情绪得分的预定等效性范围内,这意味着这些变量的等效性得到了确认。
近伴 PBL 课程和教师主导课程的情绪结果相当。这种对近伴学习中情绪结果的比较测量有助于理解医学教育领域的 PBL。