Bartel Sara, Sherry Simon, Mahu Ioan, Stewart Sherry
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University.
Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University.
Cannabis. 2023 Feb 7;6(1):34-49. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023.01.004. eCollection 2023.
Alcohol and cannabis use motives are often studied as contributors to risky substance use patterns. While various measures for capturing such motives exist, most contain 20+ items, which render their inclusion in certain research designs (e.g., daily diary) or with certain populations (e.g., polysubstance users) unfeasible. We sought to generate and validate six-item measures of cannabis and alcohol motives from existing measures, the Marijuana Motives Measure (MMM) and the Modified Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised (MDMQ-R).
In Study 1, items were generated, feedback from 33 content- domain experts was obtained, and item revisions were made. In Study 2, the finalized brief cannabis and alcohol motives measures, along with the MMM, MDMQ-R, and substance-related measures, were administered to 176 emerging adult cannabis and alcohol users (71.6% female) at two timepoints, two months apart. Participants were recruited through a participant pool.
Study 1 experts indicated satisfactory ratings of face and content validity. Expert feedback was used to revise three items. Study 2 results suggest test-retest reliabilities for the single-item forms ( .34 to .60) were similar to those obtained with full motives measures ( = .39 to .67). Validity was acceptable-to-excellent in that brief and full-length measures were significantly intercorrelated ( = .40 to .83). The brief and full-length measures had similar concurrent and predictive relationships for cannabis and alcohol quantity x frequency (coping- with-anxiety for cannabis and enhancement for alcohol) and problems (coping-with-depression), respectively.
The brief measures represent psychometrically-sound measures of cannabis and alcohol use motives with substantially less participant burden than the MMM and MDMQ-R.
酒精和大麻使用动机常被作为危险物质使用模式的促成因素进行研究。虽然存在多种用于捕捉此类动机的测量方法,但大多数包含20多个项目,这使得它们在某些研究设计(如每日日记)中或针对某些人群(如多物质使用者)时不可行。我们试图从现有的测量方法,即大麻动机测量量表(MMM)和修订版饮酒动机问卷(MDMQ-R)中生成并验证六项大麻和酒精动机测量量表。
在研究1中,生成项目,获得33位内容领域专家的反馈,并对项目进行修订。在研究2中,最终确定的简短大麻和酒精动机测量量表,连同MMM、MDMQ-R以及与物质相关的测量量表,在两个时间点对176名新兴成年大麻和酒精使用者(71.6%为女性)进行施测,时间间隔为两个月。参与者通过参与者库招募。
研究1中的专家表示,表面效度和内容效度的评分令人满意。专家反馈被用于修订三个项目。研究2的结果表明,单项形式的重测信度(.34至.60)与完整动机测量量表获得的信度相似(=.39至.67)。效度从可接受到优秀,因为简短和全长测量量表显著相互关联(=.40至.83)。简短和全长测量量表分别对大麻和酒精的数量×频率(大麻的应对焦虑和酒精的增强)以及问题(应对抑郁)具有相似的同时效度和预测关系。
简短测量量表代表了大麻和酒精使用动机的心理测量学上合理的测量方法,与MMM和MDMQ-R相比,参与者负担大大减轻。