• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别等渗者:两个人群的比较。

Identifying normosmics: a comparison of two populations.

作者信息

Heywood P G, Costanzo R M

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 1986 May-Jun;7(3):194-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(86)80006-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0709(86)80006-0
PMID:3728827
Abstract

An olfactory function test developed by the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) was administered to 65 normal subjects to determine its ability to identify normosmic subjects. The CCCRC test categorizes individuals into five distinct levels of olfactory functioning according to composite score ranges derived from odor identification and butanol threshold subtests. These categories are: normosmic (normal); mildly, moderately, and severely hyposmic (impaired functioning); and anosmic (no sensation). Comparing score distributions from CCCRC with ours revealed that a greater percentage of our subjects were categorized as hyposmic because of higher butanol thresholds. The butanol threshold subtest was studied further to determine test-retest reliability and normal day-to-day variability in scores. Norms are the basis for interpreting test scores and are important in diagnosing and treating smell disorders.

摘要

康涅狄格化学感觉临床研究中心(CCCRC)开发的一项嗅觉功能测试应用于65名正常受试者,以确定其识别嗅觉正常受试者的能力。CCCRC测试根据气味识别和丁醇阈值子测试得出的综合分数范围,将个体分为五个不同的嗅觉功能水平类别。这些类别为:嗅觉正常(正常);轻度、中度和重度嗅觉减退(功能受损);以及嗅觉缺失(无感觉)。将CCCRC的分数分布与我们的进行比较后发现,由于丁醇阈值较高,我们的受试者中被归类为嗅觉减退的比例更高。对丁醇阈值子测试进行了进一步研究,以确定测试 - 再测试的可靠性以及分数的日常正常变异性。标准是解释测试分数的基础,在嗅觉障碍的诊断和治疗中很重要。

相似文献

1
Identifying normosmics: a comparison of two populations.识别等渗者:两个人群的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 1986 May-Jun;7(3):194-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(86)80006-0.
2
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.测定反鼻音嗅觉阈值。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
Connecticut (CCCRC) Olfactory Test: Normative Values in 426 Healthy Volunteers.康涅狄格(CCCRC)嗅觉测试:426名健康志愿者的正常值
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jan;66(1):31-4. doi: 10.1007/s12070-013-0632-z. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
The combined olfactory test in a Chinese population.中国人群中的联合嗅觉测试。
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Feb;120(2):113-6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215105003889. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
5
A pilot study of the Self-Administered Computerized Olfactory Testing System.自我管理计算机嗅觉测试系统的一项初步研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):e55-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4177.
6
Comparison of two different odorants in an olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin’ Sticks.比较两种不同气味在嗅探棒嗅觉检测阈值测试中的差异。
Rhinology. 2010 Sep;48(3):368-73. doi: 10.4193/Rhino09.212.
7
A Pilot Study of the Snap & Sniff Threshold Test.嗅觉阈值快速检测的初步研究
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 May;127(5):312-316. doi: 10.1177/0003489418760055. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
8
Validation study of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a British population: a preliminary communication.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在英国人群中的验证研究:初步交流。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02431.x.
9
The validity of CCCRC test in patients with nasal polyposis.CCCRC检测在鼻息肉患者中的有效性。
Rhinology. 2007 Mar;45(1):54-8.
10
Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.对1036名受试者进行多中心研究,采用标准化方法评估嗅觉功能,该方法结合了气味识别、气味辨别和嗅觉阈值测试。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s004050050223.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches on olfactory function and facial development in children.内镜经鼻颅底入路对儿童嗅觉功能和面部发育的影响。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Nov;40(11):3777-3788. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06446-0. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
2
The brain functional connectivity alterations in traumatic patients with olfactory disorder after low-level laser therapy demonstrated by fMRI.功能磁共振成像显示,低水平激光治疗外伤性嗅觉障碍患者的脑功能连接改变。
Neuroradiol J. 2023 Dec;36(6):716-727. doi: 10.1177/19714009231188589. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Cultural Adaptation of the Iranian Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Olfactory Test.
伊朗版“嗅觉棒”嗅觉测试的文化适应性
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Nov 17;35:153. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.153. eCollection 2021.
4
Sensitivity and Specificity of Self-Reported Olfactory Function in a Home-Based Study of Independent-Living, Healthy Older Women.居家独立生活的健康老年女性研究中自我报告嗅觉功能的敏感性和特异性
Chemosens Percept. 2014 Dec 1;7(3-4):108-116. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9170-7.
5
Olfactory function following open rhinoplasty: A 6-month follow-up study.开放式鼻整形术后的嗅觉功能:一项为期6个月的随访研究。
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2008 Oct 3;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-8-6.
6
Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic and workplace.嗅觉功能障碍及其在临床和工作场所的测量。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Apr;79(4):268-82. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0055-6. Epub 2006 Jan 21.
7
Health effects of indoor odorants.室内气味物质对健康的影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Nov;95:53-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919553.