Chauhan Ankita, Samnaliev Mihail, Ken-Opurum Jennifer, Srinivas Sistla S S, Mehta Aashay M, Dex Terry, Charland Scott, Revel Andrew, Preblick Ronald
Axtria Inc., Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA.
Axtria India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, India.
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Aug;14(8):1331-1344. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01419-z. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
The fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine (iGlar) plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) has proven efficacious in clinical trials; however, there is limited evidence of its benefits in a variety of real-world patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who present in routine clinical practice.
A large integrated claims and EHR database was used to identify two real-world (RW) cohorts (ages ≥ 18) with T2DM who were eligible for treatment with iGlarLixi. At baseline, the first cohort (insulin cohort) received insulin with or without oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), and the second cohort (OAD-only cohort) received OADs only. A Monte Carlo patient-level simulation was applied to each cohort based on treatment strategies and efficacies from the LixiLan-L and LixiLan-O trials to estimate reductions in glycated hemoglobin A1C (A1C) and the percentage achieving age-based A1C goals (≤ 7% for ages < 65 and ≤ 8% for ages ≥ 65) at 30 weeks.
The RW insulin (N = 3797) and OAD-only (N = 17,633) cohorts differed considerably in demographics, age, clinical characteristics, baseline A1C levels, and background OAD therapies compared to the populations in the Lixilan-L and Lixilan-O trials. Regardless of the cohort description, A1C goals were achieved among 52.6% vs. 31.6% (p < 0.001) of patients in the iGlarLixi vs. the iGlar arms in the insulin cohort simulation, while A1C goals were achieved among 59.9% vs. 49.3% and 32.8% (p < 0.001) of patients in the OAD-only cohort simulation in the iGlarLixi vs. the iGlar and lixisenatide arms, respectively.
Irrespective of the treatment regimen at baseline (insulin vs. OAD only), this patient-level simulation demonstrated that a greater proportion of patients achieved their A1C goals with iGlarlixi compared to iGlar or lixisenatide alone. These findings suggest that the benefits of iGlarLixi extend to clinically distinct RW populations.
在临床试验中,甘精胰岛素(iGlar)与利司那肽(iGlarLixi)的固定比例联合用药已被证明有效;然而,对于常规临床实践中出现的各种2型糖尿病(T2DM)真实世界患者,其获益证据有限。
使用一个大型综合索赔和电子健康记录数据库,识别出两个符合iGlarLixi治疗条件的T2DM真实世界(RW)队列(年龄≥18岁)。在基线时,第一个队列(胰岛素队列)接受胰岛素治疗,可联合或不联合口服降糖药(OADs),第二个队列(仅OADs队列)仅接受OADs治疗。基于LixiLan-L和LixiLan-O试验的治疗策略和疗效,对每个队列应用蒙特卡洛患者水平模拟,以估计30周时糖化血红蛋白A1C(A1C)的降低情况以及达到基于年龄的A1C目标(年龄<65岁时≤7%,年龄≥65岁时≤8%)的患者百分比。
与Lixilan-L和Lixilan-O试验中的人群相比,真实世界胰岛素队列(N = 3797)和仅OADs队列(N = 17,633)在人口统计学、年龄、临床特征、基线A1C水平和背景OAD治疗方面存在很大差异。无论队列描述如何,在胰岛素队列模拟中,iGlarLixi组与iGlar组相比,分别有52.6%和31.6%(p < 0.001)的患者实现了A1C目标,而在仅OADs队列模拟中,iGlarLixi组与iGlar组和利司那肽组相比,分别有59.9%、49.3%和32.8%(p < 0.001)的患者实现了A1C目标。
无论基线治疗方案(胰岛素治疗还是仅OADs治疗)如何,该患者水平模拟表明,与单独使用iGlar或利司那肽相比,使用iGlarLixi的患者中有更大比例实现了A1C目标。这些发现表明,iGlarLixi的益处扩展到了临床上不同的真实世界人群。