Buysman Erin K, Fan Tao, Blauer-Peterson Cori, Miller-Wilson Lesley-Ann
Health Economics and Outcomes Research Department Optum, Inc. Eden Prairie MN USA.
Sanofi US, Inc. Bridgewater NJ USA.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018 Jun 11;1(3):e00019. doi: 10.1002/edm2.19. eCollection 2018 Jul.
To investigate the impact of treatment intensification (TI) on glycaemic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes with glycated haemoglobin A (A1C) ≥7% after ≥6 months of treatment with 2 oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) or basal insulin (BI).
Data were extracted from the Optum administrative claims database from 1 January 2009 to 31 August 2015. Patients with TI ≤6 months after the first A1C ≥7% (index date) were compared with patients with no TI (NTI). TI included addition of OAD, GLP-1 receptor agonist or premixed insulin in OAD and BI cohorts, addition of BI and/or bolus insulin in the OAD cohort and addition of bolus insulin or increasing BI dose in the BI cohort. Change from the index A1C value and hypoglycaemia events was compared at 12 months after TI after adjusting for confounders.
A total of 3990/28 123 (14.2%) and 10 425/16 140 (65%) of eligible adults in the OAD and BI cohorts, respectively, underwent TI. These patients showed greater adjusted A1C change vs NTI patients (OAD cohort: -0.59% vs -0.25%; BI cohort: -0.30% vs -0.16%; <.001 for both comparisons), but with higher hypoglycaemia rates (OAD cohort: odds ratio [OR] 1.68; <.001; BI cohort: OR: 1.23; =.004) at follow-up.
Clinical inertia appears to be a significant issue in this population. Although associated with more frequent hypoglycaemia, these results demonstrate that timely TI improves A1C levels, highlighting the need for new and improved agents to effectively manage glycaemia while reducing hypoglycaemia risk.
研究治疗强化(TI)对接受两种口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)或基础胰岛素(BI)治疗≥6个月后糖化血红蛋白A(A1C)≥7%的2型糖尿病患者血糖结局的影响。
数据取自2009年1月1日至2015年8月31日的Optum行政索赔数据库。将首次A1C≥7%(索引日期)后TI≤6个月的患者与未进行TI(NTI)的患者进行比较。TI包括在OAD和BI队列中添加OAD、GLP-1受体激动剂或预混胰岛素,在OAD队列中添加BI和/或餐时胰岛素,以及在BI队列中添加餐时胰岛素或增加BI剂量。在调整混杂因素后,比较TI后12个月时索引A1C值的变化和低血糖事件。
OAD和BI队列中分别有3990/28123(14.2%)和10425/16140(65%)符合条件的成年人接受了TI。与NTI患者相比,这些患者的A1C调整变化更大(OAD队列:-0.59%对-0.25%;BI队列:-0.30%对-0.16%;两组比较均P<.001),但随访时低血糖发生率更高(OAD队列:优势比[OR]1.68;P<.001;BI队列:OR:1.23;P=.004)。
临床惰性在该人群中似乎是一个重要问题。尽管与更频繁的低血糖相关,但这些结果表明及时进行TI可改善A1C水平,凸显了需要新的和改进的药物来有效控制血糖同时降低低血糖风险。