Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan Shiang, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 8;31(7):384. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07859-4.
There is no consensus on the selection of appropriate prophylactic tube feeding in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prophylactic tube feeding in patients with HNSCC who presented with a high Mallampati score and underwent CCRT.
We prospectively enrolled 185 consecutive patients with stage II to IVa HNSCC and a pre-treatment Mallampati score of 3 or 4 who received CCRT between August 2017 and December 2018 with follow-up data collected retrospectively. Patients were divided to either with or without prophylactic tube feeding group for comparison of treatment tolerance, toxicities, and quality of life(QOL). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to achieve balanced covariates across the two groups.
Of the cohort, 52 (28.1%) and 133 (71.9%) patients were allocated to the prophylactic and non-prophylactic tube feeding groups, respectively. Before and after PSM, patients in the tube feeding group had a significantly lower incidence of incomplete radiotherapy, incompletion of chemotherapy, emergency room visits, and grade 3 or higher infection, and improved symptoms of quality of life after CCRT than those in the non-tube feeding group.
Prophylactic tube feeding was associated with better treatment tolerance, safety profiles, and quality of life in patients with HNSCC and high Mallampati scores who underwent CCRT. Therefore, Mallampati score might serve as a clinical tool for proactive selection of patients receiving prophylactic tube feeding in HNSCC patients upon receiving CCRT.
在接受同期放化疗(CCRT)的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者中,对于选择合适的预防性管饲尚无共识。本研究旨在评估高 Mallampati 评分的 HNSCC 患者接受 CCRT 时预防性管饲的效果。
我们前瞻性纳入了 185 例分期为 II 期至 IVa 期的 HNSCC 患者,这些患者在接受 CCRT 之前的 Mallampati 评分为 3 或 4,且随访数据可回溯。根据是否接受预防性管饲,将患者分为管饲组和非管饲组,以比较两组的治疗耐受性、毒性和生活质量(QOL)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡两组之间的混杂因素。
在队列中,52(28.1%)例和 133(71.9%)例患者分别被分配至预防性和非预防性管饲组。在 PSM 前后,管饲组患者的不完全放疗、化疗中断、急诊就诊、3 级或更高级别的感染发生率显著降低,且 CCRT 后生活质量的症状得到改善,而在非管饲组中这些指标则相反。
预防性管饲与 HNSCC 患者接受 CCRT 时高 Mallampati 评分患者更好的治疗耐受性、安全性和生活质量相关。因此,Mallampati 评分可能成为在接受 CCRT 时,为患者选择预防性管饲的临床工具。