Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct;32(5):671-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
We performed a systematic review to examine the effect of nutritional interventions on nutritional status, quality of life (QoL) and mortality in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Cinahl from inception through January 3rd, 2012 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from a broad range of nutritional interventions in patients with HNSCC during (chemo)radiotherapy. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data.
Of 1141 titles identified, 12 study reports were finally included, describing 10 different studies with 11 interventions. Four out of 10 studies examined the effects of individualized dietary counseling, and showed significant benefits on nutritional status and QOL compared to no counseling or general nutritional advice by a nurse (p < 0.05). Three studies on oral nutritional supplements (ONS) were inconsistent about the effect on nutritional status compared with no supplementation. One study showed that nasogastric tube feeding had beneficial effects on nutritional status compared to ONS, but not in all patient groups (p < 0.04). One study showed benefits of percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy (PEG) feeding on nutritional status shortly after RT compared with nasogastric feeding (p = 0.001). Two studies showed that prophylactic PEG feeding was not superior over tube feeding if required.
This review shows beneficial effects of individualized dietary counseling on nutritional status and QoL, compared to no counseling or standard nutritional advice. Effects of ONS and tube feeding were inconsistent.
我们进行了一项系统评价,旨在研究营养干预对头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者在接受放疗或放化疗期间对营养状况、生活质量(QoL)和死亡率的影响。
我们检索了 Pubmed、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 Cinahl,从建库至 2012 年 1 月 3 日,以确定在(放)化疗期间接受广泛营养干预的 HNSCC 患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位审查员独立评估研究的纳入和偏倚风险,并提取数据。
在 1141 个标题中,最终有 12 个研究报告被包括在内,描述了 10 项不同研究的 11 种干预措施。其中 4 项研究评估了个体化饮食咨询的效果,与无咨询或护士提供的一般营养建议相比,在营养状况和 QOL 方面显示出显著益处(p<0.05)。3 项关于口服营养补充剂(ONS)的研究在与无补充相比对营养状况的影响方面结果不一致。一项研究表明,与 ONS 相比,鼻胃管喂养对营养状况有有益影响,但并非所有患者群体均如此(p<0.04)。一项研究表明,与鼻胃管喂养相比,经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)喂养在 RT 后短期内对营养状况有有益影响(p=0.001)。两项研究表明,如果需要,预防性 PEG 喂养并不优于管饲。
本综述表明,与无咨询或标准营养建议相比,个体化饮食咨询对营养状况和 QoL 有有益影响。ONS 和管饲的效果不一致。