• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缩短非计划性紧急剖宫产的决策至实施时间。

Decreasing Decision-to-Incision Times for Unscheduled, Urgent Cesarean Deliveries.

机构信息

Boston Medical Center, and the Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):130-138. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005221. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005221
PMID:37290107
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To standardize the preprocedure process for urgent, unscheduled cesarean deliveries to decrease the time from decision to skin incision to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

METHODS

In our quality-improvement project, we selected indications that require urgent cesarean deliveries, created a standard algorithm, then implemented a multidisciplinary process intended to reduce decision-to-incision time. This initiative was conducted from May 2019 to May 2021, with a preimplementation period from May 2019 to November 2019 (n=199), implementation period from December 2019 to September 2020 (n=283), and postimplementation period from October 2020 to May 2021 (n=160). An interrupted time series calculation was performed, with stratification by patient race and ethnicity. The primary process measure was mean decision-to-incision time. The secondary outcomes were neonatal status as measured by 5-minute Apgar score and quantitative blood loss during the cesarean delivery.

RESULTS

We analyzed 642 urgent cesarean deliveries; 199 were preimplementation of the standard algorithm, and 160 were postimplementation. The mean decision-to-incision time improved from 88 minutes (95% CI 75-101 min) to 50 minutes (95% CI 47-53 min) from the preimplementation period to the postimplementation period. When stratified by race and ethnicity, the mean decision-to-incision time among Black non-Hispanic patients improved from 98 minutes (95% CI 73-123 min) to 50 minutes (95% CI 45-55 min) (t=3.27, P <.01); it improved from 84 minutes (95% CI 66-103 min) to 49 minutes (95% CI 44-55 min) among Hispanic patients (t=3.51, P <.001). There was no significant improvement in decision-to-incision time among patients in other racial and ethnic groups. When the cesarean delivery was performed for fetal indications, Apgar scores were significantly higher in the postimplementation period compared with the preimplementation period (8.5 vs 8.8 beta=0.29, P <.01).

CONCLUSION

Development and implementation of a standard algorithm to expedite decision-to-incision time for unscheduled, urgent cesarean deliveries led to a significant decrease in decision-to-incision time.

摘要

目的

规范紧急非计划性剖宫产的术前流程,以缩短从决策到切开皮肤的时间,改善母婴结局。

方法

在我们的质量改进项目中,我们选择了需要紧急剖宫产的指征,制定了标准算法,然后实施了一项多学科流程,旨在缩短决策到切开的时间。该倡议于 2019 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月进行,前期为 2019 年 5 月至 2019 年 11 月(n=199),实施期为 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 9 月(n=283),后期为 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月(n=160)。采用分层中断时间序列分析方法。主要过程测量指标为平均决策到切开时间。次要结局指标为新生儿 5 分钟 Apgar 评分和剖宫产期间的出血量。

结果

我们分析了 642 例紧急剖宫产,其中 199 例在标准算法实施前,160 例在实施后。决策到切开的平均时间从前期的 88 分钟(95%置信区间 75-101 分钟)改善至后期的 50 分钟(95%置信区间 47-53 分钟)。按种族和民族分层,黑人非西班牙裔患者的决策到切开的平均时间从 98 分钟(95%置信区间 73-123 分钟)改善至 50 分钟(95%置信区间 45-55 分钟)(t=3.27,P<.01);西班牙裔患者的时间从 84 分钟(95%置信区间 66-103 分钟)改善至 49 分钟(95%置信区间 44-55 分钟)(t=3.51,P<.001)。其他种族和民族群体的决策到切开时间没有显著改善。当剖宫产是为了胎儿指征进行时,后期的 Apgar 评分明显高于前期(8.5 分与 8.8 分,β=0.29,P<.01)。

结论

制定和实施加快非计划性紧急剖宫产决策到切开时间的标准算法,显著缩短了决策到切开的时间。

相似文献

1
Decreasing Decision-to-Incision Times for Unscheduled, Urgent Cesarean Deliveries.缩短非计划性紧急剖宫产的决策至实施时间。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):130-138. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005221. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
A multidisciplinary approach to improving process and outcomes in unscheduled cesarean deliveries.多学科方法改善计划性剖宫产的流程和结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Feb;2(1):100070. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100070. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery.比较横切口与纵切口用于紧急剖宫产术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1134-1140. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181df937f.
4
Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?因怀疑胎儿窘迫而行剖宫产。决定-切开时间有影响吗?
J Reprod Med. 1997 Jun;42(6):347-52.
5
Decision to Incision and Risk for Fetal Acidemia, Low Apgar Scores, and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy.分娩决策与胎儿酸血症、低阿氏评分及缺氧缺血性脑病的风险
Am J Perinatol. 2022 Mar;39(4):416-424. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717068. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术决策时间与新生儿结局:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):536-548. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000132.
7
Impact of Obstetric Communication on Decision-to-Delivery Time.产科沟通对决策至分娩时间的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2022 Oct;39(13):1389-1395. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748843. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
Time from decision to incision for cesarean deliveries at a community hospital.一家社区医院剖宫产从决定到切开的时间。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):625-629. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819970b8.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cesarean Delivery and Indications Among Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Women.初产、足月、单胎、头位产妇剖宫产及指征方面的种族和民族差异
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Aug;9(4):1161-1171. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01057-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
10
Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.决定至切开时间以及母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):6-11. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000224693.07785.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a crash cesarean section policy and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes at King Abdulaziz University Hospital: A retrospective study.实施紧急剖宫产政策及其对阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院母婴结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40645. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040645.