• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市化程度和出行时间与肺癌筛查利用的关系。

The association of urbanicity and travel time with lung cancer screening utilization.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; Center for Integrative Oncology & Survivorship, Prisma Health, 900 W Faris Rd 1st Floor, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;85:102396. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102396. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2023.102396
PMID:37290246
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To examine 1) the rate of lung cancer screening (LCS) utilization in a large healthcare system in South Carolina; 2) associations of urbanicity and travel time with LCS utilization.

METHODS

LCS-eligible patients from 2019 were identified. The outcome was LCS utilization. The exposures were zip-code level urbanicity and travel time from the centroid of zip-code area to the nearest screening site (<10,10-<20, ≥20 min). Covariates included age, sex, race, marital status, insurance, body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index (0, 1, 2, ≥3), and zip-code level median income. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were employed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 6930 patients, among whom 1432 (20.66%) received LCS. After adjusting for covariates, living in a non-metropolitan area (adjusted odds ratio: 0.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.26-0.40) and having longer travel time (0.80 [0.65-0.98] and 0.68 [0.54-0.86] for 10-<20 and ≥20 min travel time, respectively, compared to <10 min travel time) were significantly associated with lower odds of LCS utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCS utilization rate of a healthcare system was about 20% in 2019. Living in non-metropolitan areas or having longer travel time to LCS site were associated with lower LCS utilization.

摘要

背景

在南卡罗来纳州的一个大型医疗保健系统中,检查 1)肺癌筛查(LCS)的利用率;2)城市性和旅行时间与 LCS 利用的关联。

方法

确定 2019 年符合 LCS 条件的患者。结局是 LCS 的利用情况。暴露因素为邮政编码水平的城市化程度和从邮政编码区域中心到最近筛查地点的旅行时间(<10、10-<20、≥20 分钟)。协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况、保险、体重指数、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、Charlson 合并症指数(0、1、2、≥3)和邮政编码水平的中位数收入。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归进行分析。

结果

分析纳入了 6930 名患者,其中 1432 名(20.66%)接受了 LCS。在调整了协变量后,居住在非都市地区(调整后的优势比:0.32;95%置信区间:0.26-0.40)和旅行时间较长(10-<20 分钟和≥20 分钟旅行时间分别为 0.80[0.65-0.98]和 0.68[0.54-0.86],与<10 分钟旅行时间相比)与 LCS 利用率降低显著相关。

结论

2019 年,医疗保健系统的 LCS 利用率约为 20%。居住在非都市地区或前往 LCS 地点的旅行时间较长与较低的 LCS 利用率相关。

相似文献

1
The association of urbanicity and travel time with lung cancer screening utilization.城市化程度和出行时间与肺癌筛查利用的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;85:102396. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102396. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Utilization Among Transgender Patients: An Analysis of the 2017-2018 United States Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.跨性别患者的肺癌筛查资格和利用情况:对 2017-2018 年美国行为风险因素监测系统调查的分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2164-2169. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa127.
3
Comorbidity Profiles and Lung Cancer Screening among Older Adults: U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2017-2019.老年人的合并症特征与肺癌筛查:美国 2017-2019 年行为风险因素监测系统。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Nov;18(11):1886-1893. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202010-1276OC.
4
Lung Cancer Screening in Individuals With and Without Lung-Related Comorbidities.肺癌筛查在有和无肺部相关合并症的个体中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230146. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30146.
5
Understanding Washington State's Low Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening in Two Steps: A Geospatial Analysis of Patient Travel Time and Health Care Availability of Imaging Sites.理解华盛顿州肺癌筛查低参与度的两步法:患者出行时间和影像学站点医疗可及性的地理空间分析。
Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 28.
6
Factors Influencing the False Positive Rate in CT Lung Cancer Screening.影响 CT 肺癌筛查假阳性率的因素。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Feb;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S18-S22. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
7
Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Population.在 Medicare 按服务收费制人群中对肺癌筛查的利用。
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):2200-2210. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.592. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation.肺癌筛查中的种族差异:一项探索性研究。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
9
Lung Cancer Screening: Characteristics of Nonparticipants and Potential Screening Barriers.肺癌筛查:非参与者的特征和潜在的筛查障碍。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;21(5):e329-e336. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.016. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Perceptions and Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers Enrolled in a Tobacco Cessation Program.在参加戒烟计划的吸烟者中,肺癌筛查的认知和利用情况。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 Jan;20(1):e115-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers of lung cancer screening participation: umbrella and systematic review of the global evidence.肺癌筛查参与的促进因素和障碍:全球证据的综合及系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):2993. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23808-8.
2
Ranking of Health Problems and Prioritization of Cancer Education Topics by African American Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州非裔美国人社区的健康问题排名及癌症教育主题的优先排序
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug;40(4):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02543-5. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
3
Associations of social support, living arrangements, and residential stability with cancer screening in the United States.
美国社会支持、生活安排和居住稳定性与癌症筛查的关联。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Feb;36(2):157-169. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01913-0. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Geographic Accessibility and Completion of Initial Low-Dose CT-Based Lung Cancer Screening in an Urban Safety-Net Population.城市医疗服务体系中基于低剂量 CT 的肺癌筛查初始阶段的地理可及性与完成情况。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Apr 26;22(5):308-314. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7112.