Department of Emergency Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes, France.
Département de Médecine d'Urgences, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352844. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52844.
Pain is a common out-of-hospital symptom among patients, and opioids are often prescribed. Research suggests that overprescribing for acute traumatic pain is still prevalent, even when limits restricting opioid prescriptions have been implemented. Ketamine hydrochloride is an alternative to opioids in adults with out-of-hospital traumatic pain.
To assess the noninferiority of intravenous ketamine compared with intravenous morphine sulfate to provide pain relief in adults with out-of-hospital traumatic pain.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Intravenous Subdissociative-Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Prehospital Analgesia (KETAMORPH) study was a multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing ketamine hydrochloride (20 mg, followed by 10 mg every 5 minutes) with morphine sulfate (2 or 3 mg every 5 minutes) in adult patients with out-of-hospital trauma and a verbal pain score equal to or greater than 5. Enrollment occurred from November 23, 2017, to November 26, 2022, in 11 French out-of-hospital emergency medical units.
Patients were randomly assigned to ketamine (n = 128) or morphine (n = 123).
The primary outcome was the between-group difference in mean change in verbal rating scale pain scores measured from the time before administration of the study drug to 30 minutes later. A noninferiority margin of 1.3 was chosen.
A total of 251 patients were randomized (median age, 51 [IQR, 34-69] years; 111 women [44.9%] and 140 men [55.1%] among the 247 with data available) and were included in the intention-to-treat population. The mean pain score change was -3.7 (95% CI, -4.2 to -3.2) in the ketamine group compared with -3.8 (95% CI, -4.2 to -3.4) in the morphine group. The difference in mean pain score change was 0.1 (95% CI, -0.7 to 0.9) points. There were no clinically meaningful differences for vital signs between the 2 groups. The intravenous morphine group had 19 of 113 (16.8% [95% CI, 10.4%-25.0%]) adverse effects reported (most commonly nausea [12 of 113 (10.6%)]) compared with 49 of 120 (40.8% [95% CI, 32.0%-49.6%]) in the ketamine group (most commonly emergence phenomenon [24 of 120 (20.0%)]). No adverse events required intervention.
In the KETAMORPH study of patients with out-of-hospital traumatic pain, the use of intravenous ketamine compared with morphine showed noninferiority for pain reduction. In the ongoing opioid crisis, ketamine administered alone is an alternative to opioids in adults with out-of-hospital traumatic pain.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03236805.
重要性:疼痛是患者在院外常见的症状之一,经常会开阿片类药物进行治疗。研究表明,即使已经实施了限制阿片类药物处方的规定,急性创伤性疼痛的过度处方仍很普遍。盐酸氯胺酮是院外创伤性疼痛成人患者的阿片类药物替代药物。
目的:评估静脉注射氯胺酮与硫酸吗啡在提供院外创伤性疼痛成人患者的疼痛缓解方面的非劣效性。
设计、地点和参与者:静脉注射亚分离剂量氯胺酮与硫酸吗啡用于院前镇痛(KETAMORPH)研究是一项多中心、单盲、非劣效性随机临床试验,比较了盐酸氯胺酮(20mg,随后每 5 分钟 10mg)与硫酸吗啡(每 5 分钟 2 或 3mg)在院外创伤且口述疼痛评分等于或大于 5 的成年患者中的疗效。招募于 2017 年 11 月 23 日至 2022 年 11 月 26 日在法国 11 个院外急救医疗单位进行。
干预措施:患者被随机分配至氯胺酮组(n=128)或吗啡组(n=123)。
主要结局和测量:主要结局是从给予研究药物前到 30 分钟后,两组间口述疼痛评分的平均变化差异。选择了 1.3 的非劣效性边界。
结果:共有 251 名患者被随机分配(中位数年龄 51[IQR,34-69]岁;111 名女性[44.9%]和 140 名男性[55.1%],其中 247 名有数据)并纳入意向治疗人群。与吗啡组(95%CI,-4.2 至-3.4)相比,氯胺酮组的平均疼痛评分变化为-3.7(95%CI,-4.2 至-3.2)。两组之间的平均疼痛评分变化差异为 0.1(95%CI,-0.7 至 0.9)点。两组之间的生命体征均无临床意义的差异。与吗啡组(95%CI,10.4%-25.0%)相比,氯胺酮组(95%CI,32.0%-49.6%)报告的不良事件(最常见的是恶心[113 例中的 12 例(10.6%)]))有 49 例(120 例中的 40.8%)(最常见的是出现现象[120 例中的 24 例(20.0%)])。没有不良事件需要干预。
结论和相关性:在 KETAMORPH 研究中,与吗啡相比,使用静脉注射氯胺酮治疗院外创伤性疼痛具有非劣效性。在持续的阿片类药物危机中,氯胺酮单独使用是院外创伤性疼痛成人患者的阿片类药物替代药物。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03236805。