• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创建干针疗法知情同意书风险告知:名义群体技术。

Creation of a risk of harms informed consent form for dry needling: A nominal group technique.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Youngstown State University, 1 University Plaza, Youngstown, OH, 44555, USA.

Youngstown State University, USA.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102778. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102778. Epub 2023 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102778
PMID:37290346
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When consenting patients to dry needling treatment, it is necessary to inform patients of potential risks of harms.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify elements and framework for an Informed Consent (IC) risk of harm statement to improve patient decision-making.

DESIGN

A virtual Nominal Group Technique (vNGT) methodology was used to achieve consensus among participants to identify what needs to be on a consent form, how it should be framed, and what it should state so patients understand the true risks.

METHODS

Eligible participants were identified as one of four groups: legal expert, policy expert, dry needling expert, or patient. The vNGT session consisted of 5 rounds of idea generation and final consensus voting which lasted for 2 h.

RESULTS

Five individuals consented to participate. Of the 27 original ideas, 22 reached consensus including ones specifically related to a risk of harms statement: identifying risks and discomforts, identify different sensations, and using a classification to order risks by severity. Consensus was achieved with percent agreement of ≥ 80%. The constructed risk of harm statement had a reading level of grade 7 and provided a list of stratified risks associated with dry needling.

CONCLUSION

The generated risk of harm statement can be incorporated on IC forms that require disclosure of risks in both the clinical and research setting. Additionally, further elements were identified by panel participants about defining the framework for an IC form outside of the risk of harm statement.

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT05560100 (29/09/22).

摘要

背景

在同意患者接受干针治疗时,有必要告知患者潜在的伤害风险。

目的

本研究旨在确定知情同意书(IC)伤害风险声明的要素和框架,以改善患者的决策。

设计

采用虚拟名义群体技术(vNGT)方法,让参与者达成共识,确定同意书中需要包含哪些内容,应如何陈述,以及应如何陈述以便患者了解真实风险。

方法

合格的参与者被确定为四个组之一:法律专家、政策专家、干针专家或患者。vNGT 会议由 5 轮想法生成和最终共识投票组成,持续 2 小时。

结果

有 5 人同意参加。在最初的 27 个想法中,有 22 个达成共识,其中包括专门涉及伤害风险声明的想法:确定风险和不适、识别不同感觉,以及使用分类法按严重程度对风险进行排序。达成共识的百分比协议≥80%。构建的伤害风险声明的阅读水平为 7 级,并提供了与干针治疗相关的分层风险列表。

结论

生成的伤害风险声明可以纳入临床和研究环境中需要披露风险的知情同意书中。此外,小组参与者还确定了在伤害风险声明之外定义知情同意书框架的其他要素。

政府注册

NCT05560100(29/09/22)。

相似文献

1
Creation of a risk of harms informed consent form for dry needling: A nominal group technique.创建干针疗法知情同意书风险告知:名义群体技术。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102778. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102778. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Identifying which adverse events associated with dry needling should be included for informed consent: A modified e-Delphi study.确定应纳入知情同意书的与干针治疗相关的不良事件:一项改良的电子德尔菲研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Aug;40(8):1731-1743. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2208668. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.国际异种移植协会关于开展1型糖尿病猪胰岛产品临床试验条件的共识声明——第7章:知情同意与异种移植临床试验
Xenotransplantation. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00546.x.
5
Towards more homogenous and rigorous methods in sham-controlled dry needling trials: two Delphi surveys.迈向更同质和严谨的假针刺对照试验方法:两项德尔菲调查。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Mar;106:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
An attempt to standardize the radiodiagnostic risk statement in an Institutional Review Board consent form.在机构审查委员会同意书中规范放射诊断风险声明的尝试。
Invest Radiol. 1993 Jun;28(6):533-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199306000-00014.
7
A reflection on the use of virtual nominal group technique in health policy and research priority consensus studies.关于虚拟名词组技术在卫生政策与研究重点共识研究中的应用反思。
Nurse Res. 2024 Sep 11;32(3):35-41. doi: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1933. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
Identifying essential information to support patient decision-making regarding participation in cancer clinical trials: A Delphi study.确定支持患者参与癌症临床试验决策的关键信息:一项德尔菲研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Nov;27(6):e12954. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12954.
9
Development and pilot testing of an informed consent video for patients with limb trauma prior to debridement surgery using a modified Delphi technique.使用改良德尔菲技术为肢体创伤患者在清创手术前制作知情同意视频并进行试点测试。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 29;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0228-3.
10
Informed consent for intravascular administration of contrast material: how much is enough?血管内注射造影剂的知情同意:多少才算足够?
Radiology. 1989 May;171(2):509-14. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704817.