Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Dec;32(12):2467-2472. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
In the presence of an isolated supraspinatus tear, the force applied to the greater tuberosity is reduced, which may lead to bony morphologic changes. Thus, diagnostic or surgical identification of landmarks to properly repair the torn tendon might be difficult if the anatomy of the greater tuberosity is altered. The objectives of the study were to assess the presence of the superior, middle, and inferior facets of the greater tuberosity in individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tendon tears and the associations between tear size, tear location and presence of each facet.
Thirty-seven individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tendon tears were recruited to participate in the study. Individuals underwent a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the involved shoulder and images were segmented to generate subject specific models of each humerus. The vertices comprising each facet were identified; however, if even a single vertex comprising the facet was missing, the facet was considered altered. Percentage agreement for correctly identifying the presence of each facet was determined using 2 additional observers and 5 randomly selected humeri. Ultrasonography was performed to assess anterior-posterior (AP) tear size and tear location. Outcome parameters included presence of the superior, middle, and inferior facets; AP tear size; and tear location. Point-biserial correlations were used to determine the associations between AP tear size, tear location, and presence of the superior, middle, and inferior facets.
Supraspinatus tear size and tear location was 13.1 ± 6.1 mm (range, 1.9-28.3 mm) and 2.0 ± 4.4 mm from the posterior edge of the long head of the biceps tendon (range, 0.0-19.0 mm), respectively. Overall, the superior, middle, and inferior facets were not altered in 24.3%, 29.7%, and 45.9% of individuals, respectively. Percentage agreement between observers was 83.4% on average. No associations were found between tear size or tear location and presence of the superior, middle, or inferior facet (P values ranged from .19 to .74).
Individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears experience significant alterations in the bony morphology of the greater tuberosity that were irrespective of supraspinatus tear size and location. This information is useful for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons as the altered anatomy may influence the ability to identify important anatomic landmarks during diagnostic imaging or surgical procedures.
在孤立性冈上肌腱撕裂的情况下,作用于大结节的力减小,这可能导致骨形态学改变。因此,如果大结节的解剖结构发生改变,诊断或手术识别适当修复撕裂肌腱的标志可能会很困难。本研究的目的是评估有症状的孤立性冈上肌腱撕裂患者大结节的上、中、下关节面的存在情况,以及撕裂大小、撕裂位置与各关节面之间的关系。
招募了 37 名有症状的孤立性冈上肌腱撕裂患者参与研究。患者接受了受累肩部的高分辨率计算机断层扫描,对图像进行分割,为每个肱骨生成了特定于个体的模型。确定了每个关节面的顶点;但是,如果组成关节面的单个顶点缺失,则认为该关节面发生了改变。使用另外 2 名观察者和 5 个随机选择的肱骨确定正确识别每个关节面存在的百分比一致性。进行超声检查以评估前后(AP)撕裂大小和撕裂位置。结局参数包括上、中、下关节面的存在、AP 撕裂大小和撕裂位置。点双序列相关用于确定 AP 撕裂大小、撕裂位置与上、中、下关节面存在之间的关系。
冈上肌腱撕裂大小和撕裂位置分别为 13.1±6.1mm(范围 1.9-28.3mm)和 2.0±4.4mm 自肱二头肌长头肌腱后缘(范围 0.0-19.0mm)。总体而言,分别有 24.3%、29.7%和 45.9%的患者的上、中、下关节面未发生改变。观察者之间的平均百分比一致性为 83.4%。撕裂大小或撕裂位置与上、中或下关节面的存在之间均无关联(P 值范围为.19 至.74)。
有症状的孤立性冈上肌腱撕裂患者的大结节骨形态发生了显著改变,而与冈上肌腱撕裂的大小和位置无关。该信息对放射科医生和骨科医生很有用,因为改变的解剖结构可能会影响在诊断成像或手术过程中识别重要解剖标志的能力。