• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椭圆形根管用 TotalFill 生物陶瓷或 AH plus 密封剂充填后的再治疗。

Retreatment of oval-shaped root canals filled with TotalFill bioceramic or AH plus sealer.

机构信息

Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, National Guard Health Affairs, P.O. Box 22490, 11426, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 8;13(1):9357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36608-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-36608-0
PMID:37291272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10250336/
Abstract

This study investigated retreatment of oval canals filled with gutta-percha and different sealers using WaveOne Gold (WOG). Single oval canals were prepared to size 30, 0.04 and obturated with gutta percha and AH Plus (AHP) or TotalFill bioceramic (TFBC) sealer. After 6-month incubation, the canals were retreated with WOG Primary (25, 0.07) under simulated body temperature, and the developed load and torque were simultaneously measured. The time and regaining the apical patency were checked. Micro-computed tomography scanning was performed to calculate the remaining obturating materials. An independent t-test and chi-square test were performed at a 95% confidence level. A shorter retreatment time was needed in TFBC than in AHP (P = 0.003). However, a higher maximum apical load was reported with AHP (P = 0.000). Meanwhile, comparable maximum coronal load and maximum torque values were observed. Apical patency was regained in all TFBC roots and only 75% of the AHP samples (P = 0.217). The remaining obturating materials were comparable in TFBC (13.02 ± 8.12%) and AHP (10.11 ± 8.46%) (P = 0.398). WOG was able to remove 89.89% and 86.98% of obturating materials in TFBC and AHP, respectively. The TFBC presented lower apical loads and faster retreatment compared to AHP.

摘要

本研究探讨了使用 WaveOne Gold(WOG)对填充有牙胶和不同密封剂的椭圆形根管进行再治疗。将单个椭圆形根管预备至 30 号、0.04 规格,并分别用牙胶和 AH Plus(AHP)或 TotalFill 生物陶瓷(TFBC)密封剂进行填充。经过 6 个月的孵育,在模拟体温下,用 WOG Primary(25,0.07)对根管进行再治疗,并同时测量所产生的负载和扭矩。检查再治疗时间和重新获得根尖通畅度的情况。使用微计算机断层扫描来计算剩余的封闭材料。在 95%置信水平下进行独立 t 检验和卡方检验。TFBC 所需的再治疗时间比 AHP 短(P=0.003)。然而,AHP 报道的最大根尖负载更高(P=0.000)。同时,观察到可比的最大冠向负载和最大扭矩值。所有 TFBC 根都重新获得了根尖通畅度,而只有 75%的 AHP 样本(P=0.217)。TFBC (13.02±8.12%)和 AHP (10.11±8.46%)中的剩余封闭材料相似(P=0.398)。WOG 能够分别去除 TFBC 和 AHP 中 89.89%和 86.98%的封闭材料。与 AHP 相比,TFBC 呈现出较低的根尖负载和更快的再治疗速度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86be/10250336/944234a9315e/41598_2023_36608_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86be/10250336/e711b48226df/41598_2023_36608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86be/10250336/944234a9315e/41598_2023_36608_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86be/10250336/e711b48226df/41598_2023_36608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86be/10250336/944234a9315e/41598_2023_36608_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Retreatment of oval-shaped root canals filled with TotalFill bioceramic or AH plus sealer.椭圆形根管用 TotalFill 生物陶瓷或 AH plus 密封剂充填后的再治疗。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 8;13(1):9357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36608-0.
2
Assessment of Bioceramic Sealer Retreatability and Its Influence on Force and Torque Generation.生物陶瓷封闭剂可再处理性及其对力和扭矩产生的影响评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 5;15(9):3316. doi: 10.3390/ma15093316.
3
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from oval root canals: a micro-computed tomography study.ProTaper Universal 旋转根管再治疗系统去除椭圆形根管内牙胶的效果:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Endod. 2012 Nov;38(11):1516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
4
Retreatability of Bioceramic Sealer Using One Curve Rotary File Assessed by Microcomputed Tomography.采用单曲线旋转锉评估生物陶瓷封闭剂的可退缩性:微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Oct 1;22(10):1175-1183.
5
Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment.在非手术根管再治疗中使用新的补充仪器规程对 BC 密封剂和 AH Plus 根管密封剂进行可退缩性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):891-899. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03376-4. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
6
Impact of the Root Canal Taper on the Apical Adaptability of Sealers used in a Single-cone Technique: A Micro-computed Tomography Study.根管锥度对单锥技术中使用的封闭剂根尖适应性的影响:一项显微计算机断层扫描研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):808-815.
7
Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne.C-Point 和 BC 牙胶联合与冷牙胶侧方加压技术、AH Plus 根充糊剂的根管封闭性能比较——自调式根管锉与机用镍钛锉预备椭圆形根管后的体外研究
Int Endod J. 2016 Apr;49(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/iej.12455. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
8
Effectiveness of Reciproc Blue in removing canal filling material and regaining apical patency.Reciproc 蓝在去除根管内充填材料和恢复根尖通畅性方面的有效性。
Int Endod J. 2019 Feb;52(2):250-257. doi: 10.1111/iej.12991. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Retreatment efficacy of hydraulic calcium silicate sealers used in single cone obturation.单根管充填中应用水门汀类根管封闭剂的再治疗疗效。
J Dent. 2020 Jul;98:103370. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103370. Epub 2020 May 7.
10
Micro-CT assessment of gap-containing areas along the gutta-percha-sealer interface in oval-shaped canals.微 CT 评估沿椭圆形根管牙胶-封闭剂界面含间隙区域。
Int Endod J. 2022 Jul;55(7):795-807. doi: 10.1111/iej.13744. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Retreatability of calcium silicate-based sealers based on micro-computed tomographic evaluation - A systematic review.基于微计算机断层扫描评估的硅酸钙基封闭剂的可再处理性——一项系统评价
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Oct;36(10):1278-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Effect of the filling technique on the filling removal from oval-shaped canals.充填技术对椭圆形根管内充填物去除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 27;28(8):453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05853-6.
3
Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Resin and Calcium Silicate Based Sealers Removal in Mandibular Molars Curved Canals.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficiency of the new reciprocating and rotary systems with or without ultrasonics in removing root-canals filling with calcium silicate-based sealer (MTA).新型往复式和旋转式器械联合或不联合超声在去除以硅酸钙为基础的根管封闭剂(MTA)的根管充填中的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02684-3.
2
Assessment of Bioceramic Sealer Retreatability and Its Influence on Force and Torque Generation.生物陶瓷封闭剂可再处理性及其对力和扭矩产生的影响评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 5;15(9):3316. doi: 10.3390/ma15093316.
3
The Effect of Sealer Application Methods on Voids Volume after Aging of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
下颌磨牙弯曲根管中树脂类和硅酸钙类封闭剂去除的显微计算机断层扫描分析
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Jun;58(2):134-144. doi: 10.15644/asc58/2/3.
三种硅酸钙基封闭剂老化后封闭剂应用方法对空隙体积的影响:一项显微计算机断层扫描研究
Tomography. 2022 Mar 14;8(2):778-788. doi: 10.3390/tomography8020064.
4
Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Quality of Root Canal Fillings in Mandibular Molars after Obturation for 54 Months.54 个月后下颌磨牙根管封闭后根管充填质量的微计算机断层扫描评估。
J Endod. 2021 Nov;47(11):1783-1789. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin (AH Plus) sealer with two different retreatment files: An study.使用两种不同再治疗锉对生物陶瓷封闭剂(BioRoot RCS)和环氧树脂封闭剂(AH Plus)再治疗性能的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):88-93. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_657_20. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Efficacy of XP-endo instruments in removing 54 month-aged root canal filling material from mandibular molars.XP-endo 器械去除下颌磨牙 54 个月龄根管充填材料的效果。
J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103734. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103734. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Solubility of bioceramic- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生物陶瓷和环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的溶解性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):690-702. doi: 10.1111/aej.12487. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Comparison of Torque, Screw-in Force, and Shaping Ability of Glide Path Instruments in Continuous Rotation and Optimum Glide Path Motion.连续旋转和 Optimum Glide Path 运动条件下,不同导丝在扭矩、旋入力和成型能力方面的比较。
J Endod. 2021 Jan;47(1):94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
A 12-month follow-up of primary and secondary root canal treatment in teeth obturated with a hydraulic sealer.用液压密封剂封闭的主根管和次根管治疗的 12 个月随访。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2757-2764. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03590-0. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Analysis of Force and Torque with XP Shaper and OneCurve Systems During Shaping of Narrow Canals.分析 XP Shaper 和 OneCurve 系统在狭窄根管成形时的力和扭矩。
Eur Endod J. 2020 May 14;5(2):123-127. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.96967. eCollection 2020.