Silva Emmanuel J N L, Cardoso Milla Lessa, Rodrigues Jéssica Perrut, De-Deus Gustavo, Fidalgo Tatiana Kelly da Silva
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):690-702. doi: 10.1111/aej.12487. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether epoxy resin-based root canal sealers present an increased solubility than calcium silicate-based root canal sealers. A systematic search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and Open Grey. The inclusion criteria consisted of in vitro studies that compared the solubility of epoxy resin-based and calcium silicate-based sealers. The quality assessment and data extraction of the selected articles were performed. The meta-analysis of the pooled data and the subgroups according to the root thirds were carried out using the RevMan software (P < 0.05). After the duplicate removal and eligibility criteria assessment, a total of 22 studies were included all of them were considered as having a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated overall lower solubility of AH Plus. AH Plus presented lower solubility than Bio-C Sealer, BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, Sealer Plus and Total Fill BC Sealer.
本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂的溶解度是否高于基于硅酸钙的根管封闭剂。在以下数据库中进行了系统检索：PubMed、科学Direct、Scopus、科学网和Open Grey。纳入标准包括比较基于环氧树脂和基于硅酸钙的封闭剂溶解度的体外研究。对所选文章进行了质量评估和数据提取。使用RevMan软件（P < 0.05）对汇总数据和根据牙根三分法划分的亚组进行荟萃分析。在去除重复项并评估纳入标准后，共纳入22项研究，所有这些研究均被认为偏倚风险较低。荟萃分析表明AH Plus的总体溶解度较低。AH Plus的溶解度低于Bio-C封闭剂、BioRoot RCS、MTA Fillapex、Sealer Plus和Total Fill BC封闭剂。
