Shibata Tsuyoshi, Iba Yutaka, Shingaki Masami, Yamashita Osamu, Tsubakimoto Yoshinori, Kimura Fumiaki, Hatada Atsutoshi, Kasashima Fuminori, Ueno Kyohei, Nakanishi Keitaro, Morishita Kiyofumi, Nakajima Tomohiro, Nakazawa Junji, Ohkawa Akihito, Hosaka Itaru, Arihara Ayaka, Tsushima Shingo, Kawaharada Nobuyoshi
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo-shi, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Apr;32(2):490-497. doi: 10.1177/15266028231179861. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
This multicenter, prospective, observational study aimed to compare Zilver PTX and Eluvia stents in real-world settings for treating femoropopliteal lesions as the differences in the 1-year outcomes of these stents have not been elucidated.
Overall, 200 limbs with native femoropopliteal artery disease were treated with Zilver PTX (96 limbs) or Eluvia (104 limbs) at 8 Japanese hospitals between February 2019 and September 2020. The primary outcome measure of this study was primary patency at 12 months, defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of ≤2.4, without clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or stenosis ≤50% based on angiographic findings.
The baseline clinical and lesion characteristics of Zilver PTX and Eluvia groups were roughly comparable (of all limbs analyzed, approximately 30% presented with critical limb-threatening ischemia, approximately 60% presented with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C-D, and approximately half had total occlusion), except for the longer lesion lengths in the Zilver PTX group (185.7±92.0 mm vs 160.0±98.5 mm, p=0.030). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency at 12 months were 84.9% and 88.1% for Zilver PTX and Eluvia, respectively (log-rank p=0.417). Freedom from clinically-driven TLR rates were 88.8% and 90.9% for Zilver PTX and Eluvia, respectively (log-rank p=0.812).
The results of the Zilver PTX and Eluvia stents were not different regarding primary patency and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months after treating patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease in real-world settings.Clinical ImpactThis is the first study to reveal that the Zilver PTX and Eluvia have similar results in real-world practice when the proper vessel preparation is performed. However, the type of restenosis in the Eluvia stent may differ from that in the Zilver PTX stent. Therefore, the results of this study may influence the selection of DES for femoropopliteal lesions in routine clinical practice.
本多中心、前瞻性观察性研究旨在比较Zilver PTX支架和Eluvia支架在现实环境中治疗股腘动脉病变的效果,因为这两种支架1年的治疗结果差异尚未明确。
2019年2月至2020年9月期间,日本8家医院对200例患有原发性股腘动脉疾病的肢体进行了治疗,其中96例使用Zilver PTX支架,104例使用Eluvia支架。本研究的主要观察指标是12个月时的原发性通畅率,定义为收缩期峰值流速比≤2.4,无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TLR)或基于血管造影结果的狭窄≤50%。
Zilver PTX组和Eluvia组的基线临床和病变特征大致相当(在所有分析的肢体中,约30%表现为严重肢体缺血,约60%表现为跨大西洋跨学会共识II C-D级,约一半为完全闭塞),但Zilver PTX组的病变长度更长(185.7±92.0 mm对160.0±98.5 mm,p=0.030)。Zilver PTX组和Eluvia组12个月时原发性通畅率的Kaplan-Meier估计值分别为84.9%和88.1%(对数秩检验p=0.417)。Zilver PTX组和Eluvia组无临床驱动的TLR发生率分别为88.8%和90.9%(对数秩检验p=0.812)。
在现实环境中治疗股腘外周动脉疾病患者后,Zilver PTX支架和Eluvia支架在12个月时的原发性通畅率和无临床驱动的TLR方面没有差异。临床影响这是第一项揭示在进行适当的血管准备时,Zilver PTX和Eluvia在现实实践中有相似结果的研究。然而,Eluvia支架的再狭窄类型可能与Zilver PTX支架不同。因此,本研究结果可能会影响常规临床实践中股腘病变DES的选择。