Wang L, Han T D, Jiang W X, Li J, Zhang D X, Tian Y
Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 18;55(3):553-557. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.024.
To compare the safety and effectiveness of active migration technique and lithotripsy technique in the treatment of 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi by retrograde flexible ureteroscopy.
A total of 90 patients with 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi treated in the urology department of Beijing Friendship Hospital from August 2018 to August 2020 were selected as the subjects. The patients were divided into two groups using random number table: 45 patients in group A were treated with lithotripsy and 45 patients in group B were treated with active migration technique. The active migration technique was to reposition the stones in the renal calyces convenient for lithotripsy with the help of body position change, water flow scouring, laser impact or basket displacement, and then conduct laser lithotripsy and stone extraction. The data of the patients before and after operation were collected and statistically analyzed.
The age of the patients in group A was (51.6±14.1) years, including 34 males and 11 females. The stone diameter was (1.48±0.24) cm, and the stone density was (897.8±175.9) Hu. The stones were located on the left in 26 cases and on the right in 19 cases. There were 8 cases with no hydronephrosis, 20 cases with grade Ⅰ hydronephrosis, 11 cases with grade Ⅱ hydronephrosis, and 6 cases with grade Ⅲ hydronephrosis. The age of the patients in group B was (51.8±13.7) years, including 30 males and 15 females. The stone diameter was (1.52±0.22) cm, and the stone density was (964.6±214.2) Hu. The stones were located on the left in 22 cases and on the right in 23 cases. There were 10 cases with no hydronephrosis, 23 cases with grade Ⅰ hydronephrosis, 8 cases with grade Ⅱ hydronephrosis, and 4 cases with grade Ⅲ hydronephrosis. There was no significant diffe-rence in general parameters and stone indexes between the two groups. The operation time of group A was (67.1±16.9) min and the lithotripsy time was (38.0±13.2) min. The operation time of group B was (72.2±14.8) min and the lithotripsy time was (40.6±12.6) min. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Four weeks after operation, the stone-free rate in group A was 86.7%, and in group B was 97.8%. There was no significant difference between the two groups. In terms of complications, 25 cases of hematuria, 16 cases of pain, 10 cases of bladder spasm and 4 cases of mild fever occurred in group A. There were 22 cases of hematuria, 13 cases of pain, 12 cases of bladder spasm and 2 cases of mild fever in group B. There was no significant difference between the two groups.
Active migration technique is safe and effective in the treatment of 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi.
比较主动移位技术与碎石技术在逆行软性输尿管镜治疗1 - 2 cm上段输尿管结石中的安全性和有效性。
选取2018年8月至2020年8月在北京友谊医院泌尿外科治疗的90例1 - 2 cm上段输尿管结石患者作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组:A组45例采用碎石治疗,B组45例采用主动移位技术治疗。主动移位技术是借助体位改变、水流冲刷、激光冲击或网篮移位等方法将位于肾盏内的结石重新定位至便于碎石的位置,然后进行激光碎石及取石操作。收集患者手术前后的数据并进行统计学分析。
A组患者年龄为(51.6±14.1)岁,其中男性34例,女性11例。结石直径为(1.48±0.24)cm,结石密度为(897.8±175.9)Hu。结石位于左侧26例,右侧19例。无肾积水8例,Ⅰ度肾积水20例,Ⅱ度肾积水11例,Ⅲ度肾积水6例。B组患者年龄为(51.8±13.7)岁,其中男性30例,女性15例。结石直径为(1.52±0.22)cm,结石密度为(964.6±214.2)Hu。结石位于左侧22例,右侧23例。无肾积水10例,Ⅰ度肾积水23例,Ⅱ度肾积水8例,Ⅲ度肾积水4例。两组患者的一般参数及结石指标比较,差异无统计学意义。A组手术时间为(67.1±16.9)min,碎石时间为(38.0±13.2)min。B组手术时间为(72.2±14.8)min,碎石时间为(40.6±12.6)min。两组比较,差异无统计学意义。术后4周,A组结石清除率为86.7%,B组为97.8%。两组比较,差异无统计学意义。并发症方面,A组发生血尿25例、疼痛16例、膀胱痉挛10例、低热4例。B组发生血尿22例、疼痛13例、膀胱痉挛12例、低热2例。两组比较,差异无统计学意义。
主动移位技术治疗1 - 2 cm上段输尿管结石安全有效。