• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones.2650 例嵌顿性输尿管结石患者输尿管镜治疗的特点和结局。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1497-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2028-2. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.经输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管不同部位(远端、中段、上段或多处)结石的效果比较:经自然腔道内镜协会经输尿管镜全球研究临床研究办公室。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
3
Peri-Calculus Ureteral Thickness on Computed Tomography Predicts Stone Impaction at Time of Surgery: A Prospective Study.术前 CT 测量肾盂输尿管移行部厚度预测结石嵌顿的前瞻性研究。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):107-111. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0449. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Combined removal of stones with resection of concurrent pathologic ureter may be a preferred treatment for impacted ureteral stones with stricture lesions.联合结石清除术与同期病理性输尿管切除术可能是治疗伴有狭窄病变的嵌顿性输尿管结石的首选方法。
J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):243-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0507.
5
Revisiting the predictive factors for intra-operative complications of rigid ureteroscopy: a 15-year experience.重新审视硬性输尿管镜检查术中并发症的预测因素:15年经验总结
Urol J. 2012 Spring;9(2):457-64.
6
Bilateral same-session ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral calculi: critical analysis of risk factors.双侧同期输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石:危险因素的批判性分析
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2011 Mar;45(2):97-101. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.530612. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
7
Risks and Benefits of Postoperative Double-J Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy: Results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study.输尿管镜检查术后双J管置入的风险与益处:来自腔内泌尿外科协会输尿管镜全球研究临床研究办公室的结果
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):446-451. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0827. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Combined retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium YAG laser for renal calculi associated with ipsilateral ureteral stones.联合逆行软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗合并同侧输尿管结石的肾结石
J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):253-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0368.
9
Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: factors associated with intraoperative adverse events.输尿管硬镜治疗输尿管结石:与术中不良事件相关的因素
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):277-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0072.
10
Factors associated with ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral stones? A multicenter study by EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working party.输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管结石后并发输尿管狭窄的相关因素?EAU-YAU 腔内泌尿学和尿石症工作组的一项多中心研究。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Dec;47(10):631-637. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.005. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a non-invasive nomogram for predicting proximal ureteral impacted calculi.用于预测近端输尿管嵌顿结石的无创列线图的开发与验证
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 9;43(1):547. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05909-6.
2
Can the degree of ureteral stone impaction better predict surgical success and complications? a new classification system.输尿管结石嵌顿程度能否更好地预测手术成功率和并发症?一种新的分类系统。
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01912-6.
3
Nephrostomy (PCN) versus nephroureteral stent (Double JJ); An ongoing battle.肾造瘘术(经皮肾造瘘术)与输尿管支架管(双J管):一场持续的较量。
Urologia. 2025 Aug;92(3):424-431. doi: 10.1177/03915603251316702. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
4
Predictive factors for prolonged operative time in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones A retrospective cohort study.输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管结石手术时间延长的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Sep;18(9):E261-E268. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8713.
5
Propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large impacted proximal ureteral stones with long-term follow-up.经腹腔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大体积嵌顿性上段输尿管结石的倾向性评分匹配比较:长期随访。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jul 29;52(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01609-9.
6
Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis.经内镜治疗尿路结石后输尿管狭窄的发生率及相关危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 13;42(1):234. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04933-2.
7
Area of hydronephrosis is a useful predictive factor of impacted ureteral stones.积水面积是预测输尿管结石嵌顿的一个有用的预测因素。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01526-3.
8
A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones.软性输尿管镜碎石术与无管经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>15mm非梗阻性近端输尿管结石的对比分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 7;12(24):7541. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247541.
9
Prospective observational study on the prognosis of ureteral lesions caused by impacted stones via dual-energy spectral computed tomography.双能谱计算机断层扫描对嵌顿性结石所致输尿管病变预后的前瞻性观察研究
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):534-540. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
10
Comparative study between antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and reterograde intrarenal surgery in the management of impacted upper ureteric stones 1.5 cm or larger.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行输尿管软镜碎石术治疗 1.5cm 或以上嵌顿性上段输尿管结石的对比研究
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3731-3736. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04672-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of surgical treatment of ureteral strictures after laser ureterolithotripsy for impacted stones.输尿管结石嵌顿行激光输尿管碎石术后输尿管狭窄的外科治疗结果
Can J Urol. 2015 Dec;22(6):8079-84.
2
Impaction of ureteral stones into the ureteral wall: Is it possible to predict?输尿管结石嵌顿入输尿管壁:是否可以预测?
Urolithiasis. 2016 Aug;44(4):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0850-9. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
3
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscope treatment of impacted calculi: a prospective study.输尿管镜治疗嵌顿结石后输尿管狭窄的形成:一项前瞻性研究。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jan;56(1):63-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.63. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
5
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Holmium Laser for Management of Middle and Distal Ureteral Calculi.一项比较气压弹道碎石术与钬激光治疗中下段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机试验。
J Endourol. 2015 Aug;29(8):883-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0856. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
6
Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL.输尿管结石嵌顿部位的输尿管壁厚度:体外冲击波碎石术后成功率的关键预测指标。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):83-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0724-6. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助输尿管镜碎石术治疗大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的临床疗效、安全性及成本:一项前瞻性随机研究
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1064-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0167. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
8
The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.腔内泌尿外科学会临床研究办公室:11885 例患者的输尿管镜检查的适应证、并发症和结局。
J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):131-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0436. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
9
Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position.大型嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:改良侧卧位下行逆行输尿管镜碎石术与经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术的对比研究
Urol Ann. 2013 Jul;5(3):140-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.115729.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotomy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method?经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗不同部位的大 (>15mm) 嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:第四腰椎上缘是否是选择治疗方法的良好指征?
J Endourol. 2013 Sep;27(9):1120-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0535. Epub 2013 May 30.

2650 例嵌顿性输尿管结石患者输尿管镜治疗的特点和结局。

Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones.

机构信息

Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1497-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2028-2. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2028-2
PMID:28321499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5613106/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe stone-free rates and complications of ureteroscopic treatment for impacted compared with non-impacted ureteral stones and evaluate predictive variables for impaction.

METHODS

The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society prospectively collected 1 consecutive year of data from 114 centers worldwide. Patients eligible for inclusion were patients treated with ureteroscopy for ureteral stones. Patient characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were compared with regard to stone impaction. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore predictive variables for ureteral stone impaction and to analyse the effect of impaction on outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 8543 treated patients, 2650 (31%) had impacted and 5893 (69%) non-impacted stones. The stone-free rate was 87.1% for impacted stones, which is lower compared with 92.7% for non-impacted stones (p < 0.001). Intra-operative complication rates were higher for impacted stones (7.9 versus 3.0%, p < 0.001). Significantly higher ureteral perforation- and avulsion rates were reported in the impacted stone group compared with the non-impacted stone group. No association between stone impaction and post-operative complications could be shown. Female gender, ASA-score >1, prior stone treatment, positive pre-operative urine culture, and larger stones showed to be predictive variables for stone impaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopic treatment for impacted stones is associated with lower stone-free rates and higher intra-operative complication rates compared with treatment for non-impacted stones. The predictive variables for the presence of stone impaction may contribute to the identification of stone impaction during the diagnostic process. Moreover, identification of stone impaction may aid the selection of the optimal treatment modality.

摘要

目的

描述输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性和非嵌顿性输尿管结石的无石率和并发症,并评估嵌顿的预测变量。

方法

临床泌尿科协会研究办公室前瞻性地从全球 114 个中心收集了 1 年的连续数据。符合纳入标准的患者为接受输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的患者。比较了结石嵌顿患者的特征、治疗细节和结果。采用逻辑回归分析探讨输尿管结石嵌顿的预测变量,并分析嵌顿对结果的影响。

结果

在 8543 例接受治疗的患者中,2650 例(31%)有嵌顿性结石,5893 例(69%)无嵌顿性结石。嵌顿性结石的无石率为 87.1%,低于非嵌顿性结石的 92.7%(p<0.001)。嵌顿性结石术中并发症发生率较高(7.9%比 3.0%,p<0.001)。与非嵌顿性结石组相比,嵌顿性结石组报告的输尿管穿孔和撕脱率明显更高。但未发现结石嵌顿与术后并发症之间存在关联。女性、ASA 评分>1、既往结石治疗、术前尿培养阳性和较大结石是结石嵌顿的预测变量。

结论

与非嵌顿性结石相比,输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性结石的无石率较低,术中并发症发生率较高。结石嵌顿的预测变量可能有助于在诊断过程中识别结石嵌顿。此外,识别结石嵌顿可能有助于选择最佳的治疗方式。