Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, University of Wonkwang, Iksan, South Korea.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12679. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
The objective of this prospective study was to examine the efficacy of posterior interradicular and infrazygomatic crest mini-implants for en-masse anterior retraction.
The 22 patients were divided into two groups. In group 1 (IZC n = 11), mini-implants were placed in the infrazygomatic crests and in group 2 (IR, n = 11), mini-implants were placed in the molar-premolar interradicular sites. Soft tissue, skeletal, and dental treatment effects between two groups were compared using lateral cephalometric measurements.
The average angle between the cranial base and A point was 1.01 degrees (P = .004), and the linear distance between the upper incisor and A point was 2.67 to 5.2 millimetres (P = .00). In IZC group the maxillary incisor to the palatal plane moved upward by a mean of -5.20 mm (P = .059), whereas in IR group the incisor movement changed by -2.67 mm (P = .068). There was no significant difference between groups IZC and IR while comparing overall treatment changes on upper incisor position change, angle, and overjet.
Mini-implants placed in between the molar and premolar as well as the infrazygomatic crest can withstand the deepening of the bite during retraction. Mini-implants in IZC are capable of causing intrusion of the anterior teeth and preventing intrusion of the molars, thereby providing absolute anchoring in all planes. Placement of the mini-implants in the infrazygomatic crest resulted in more linear retraction.
本前瞻性研究旨在检验磨牙-前磨牙间后牙槽嵴和眶下嵴迷你种植体在整体前牙后移中的疗效。
22 名患者被分为两组。在 IZC 组(n = 11),迷你种植体置于眶下嵴;IR 组(n = 11),迷你种植体置于磨牙-前磨牙间。使用侧位头颅侧位片测量,比较两组软组织、骨骼和牙齿的治疗效果。
颅底与 A 点的平均夹角为 1.01 度(P =.004),上切牙与 A 点的直线距离为 2.67 至 5.2 毫米(P =.00)。在 IZC 组,上颌切牙向上移动了平均-5.20 毫米(P =.059),而在 IR 组,切牙移动改变了-2.67 毫米(P =.068)。在比较上颌切牙位置、角度和覆合的整体治疗变化时,IZC 组和 IR 组之间没有显著差异。
放置在磨牙和前磨牙之间以及眶下嵴的迷你种植体可以承受在深覆合矫治过程中的咬合加深。IZC 中的迷你种植体能够导致前牙内收,防止磨牙内倾,从而在所有平面上提供绝对的锚固。眶下嵴迷你种植体的植入导致了更线性的后移。