• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颧种植体用于萎缩性上颌牙槽嵴的长期成功率及患者相关预后评估

Evaluation of the Long-Term Success and Patient-Related Outcomes of Zygomatic Implants in Atrophic Maxillary Ridges.

作者信息

Koppaka Rahul, Ahmed Nabeel, Echhpal Urvi R

机构信息

Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 10;16(7):e64280. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64280. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.64280
PMID:39130852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11316677/
Abstract

Introduction Zygomatic implants (ZIs) have emerged as a promising option for rehabilitating completely edentulous patients with severe maxillary atrophy. These implants anchor into the zygomatic bone, bypassing the need for extensive grafting procedures. Success rates in dental and craniofacial implant surgeries can be influenced by several surgical factors, including suture techniques, flap design, and treatment planning. The research aimed to present the clinical outcomes and complications in individuals with severely resorbed maxillae who underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation using the Quad Zygoma Protocol (QZP) and the Anatomy-Guided Approach (AGA), focusing on long-term assessment. Material and methods Data for this retrospective study were extracted from the institution's patient database, involving a meticulous review of patient records. This comprehensive examination encompassed demographic data, preoperative assessments, details of surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and subsequent follow-up evaluations. Patients with severe maxillary bone deficiencies resulting in complete edentulism, due to inadequate bone quality and quantity in both anterior and posterior regions, were selected for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were applied to individuals with incomplete records or insufficient follow-up data, as well as those who underwent alternative treatment modalities or presented with comorbidities potentially impacting implant outcomes. The selected patients underwent treatment utilizing the QZP, with each participant subjected to a minimum three-year follow-up period. The implant survival rate, prosthetic success, complications, and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life using the OHIP-14 questionnaire were assessed. Results At the end of the follow-up period involving 12 patients (eight men, four women) with 43 ZIs - 37 from Neodent, four from Nobel Biocare, and two from Norris - with a mean duration of 4.3 years (range: 1.2-5.4), the overall success rate stood at 99.08%, with only 1 out of 42 implants failing. All patients received immediate loading with an acrylic prosthesis, proving effective in 98.2% of cases. The most common issues observed were localized soft tissue inflammation (35.7%) and sinus inflammation (12.5%), occurring after mean follow-up periods of 1.2 and 3.5 years, respectively. In 12 patients, the mean score of the OHIP-14 questionnaire was 1.6 ± 2.6, with a follow-up period of 5 ± 0.6 years. Conclusion The QZP has consistently demonstrated excellent long-term success in restoring severely reduced maxillary structures. An immediate loading approach could aid in stabilizing ZIs through cross-arch support.

摘要

引言

颧骨种植体(ZIs)已成为修复上颌严重萎缩的全口无牙患者的一种有前景的选择。这些种植体锚固在颧骨中,无需进行广泛的植骨手术。牙科和颅面种植手术的成功率可能受多种手术因素影响,包括缝合技术、皮瓣设计和治疗计划。本研究旨在呈现使用四颧骨方案(QZP)和解剖引导方法(AGA)进行修复治疗的上颌严重吸收患者的临床结果及并发症,重点是长期评估。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究的数据从机构的患者数据库中提取,包括对患者记录的细致审查。全面检查涵盖人口统计学数据、术前评估、手术过程细节、术后并发症及后续随访评估。纳入因前后部骨质质量和数量不足导致上颌骨严重缺损并全口无牙的患者。排除标准适用于记录不完整或随访数据不足的个体,以及接受替代治疗方式或存在可能影响种植结果的合并症的个体。所选患者采用QZP进行治疗,每位参与者至少随访三年。评估种植体存活率、修复成功率、并发症以及使用OHIP - 14问卷评估的口腔健康相关生活质量。

结果

在随访期结束时,12例患者(8名男性,4名女性)植入43枚ZIs,其中37枚来自Neodent,4枚来自Nobel Biocare,2枚来自Norris,平均随访时间为4.3年(范围:1.2 - 5.4年),总体成功率为99.08%,42枚种植体中仅1枚失败。所有患者均立即使用丙烯酸假体加载,98.2%的病例证明有效。观察到的最常见问题是局部软组织炎症(35.7%)和窦炎(12.5%),分别在平均随访1.2年和3.5年后出现。12例患者中,OHIP - 14问卷的平均得分为1.6±2.6,随访期为5±0.6年。

结论

QZP在恢复严重萎缩的上颌结构方面一直显示出优异的长期成功率。立即加载方法可通过跨弓支撑帮助稳定颧骨种植体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/a99ea5d5c97f/cureus-0016-00000064280-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/d96801c41812/cureus-0016-00000064280-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/ba6b7ee825c1/cureus-0016-00000064280-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/311c4ae31ecc/cureus-0016-00000064280-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/d1d7c6798d2d/cureus-0016-00000064280-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/a99ea5d5c97f/cureus-0016-00000064280-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/d96801c41812/cureus-0016-00000064280-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/ba6b7ee825c1/cureus-0016-00000064280-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/311c4ae31ecc/cureus-0016-00000064280-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/d1d7c6798d2d/cureus-0016-00000064280-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/096a/11316677/a99ea5d5c97f/cureus-0016-00000064280-i05.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Long-Term Success and Patient-Related Outcomes of Zygomatic Implants in Atrophic Maxillary Ridges.颧种植体用于萎缩性上颌牙槽嵴的长期成功率及患者相关预后评估
Cureus. 2024 Jul 10;16(7):e64280. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64280. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Long-term survival and complications of Quad Zygoma Protocol with Anatomy-Guided Approach in severely atrophic maxilla: A retrospective follow-up analysis of up to 17 years.采用解剖导向的 Quad Zygoma 方案治疗严重萎缩上颌骨的长期生存和并发症:长达 17 年的回顾性随访分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Apr;26(2):343-355. doi: 10.1111/cid.13296. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后4个月结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):11-28.
4
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):145-161.
5
Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary.一项关于采用上颌外植入即刻负重颧骨种植体修复完全无牙萎缩性上颌骨的回顾性队列研究的五年随访结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):267-81.
6
Rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla by using quad zygomatic implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用四颧骨种植体支持的假体修复严重吸收的上颌骨:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Oct;130(4):543-552. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants for the Immediate Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: 1-Year Postloading Results From a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.颧骨窦外种植体即刻修复萎缩上颌骨:多中心前瞻性队列研究的 1 年加载后结果。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):356-365. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study.一种使用上颌外固定种植体即刻功能化修复严重萎缩上颌骨的新方法:一项初步研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Nov;100(5):354-66. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60237-1.
9
A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.一项关于颧弓钛种植体用于萎缩性无牙上颌骨修复的前瞻性临床研究,随访时间为6个月至5年。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x.
10
A single-arm clinical trial investigating the feasibility of the zygomatic implant quad approach for Cawood and Howell Class 4 edentulous maxilla: An option for immediate loading.一项单臂临床试验,研究颧骨种植体 quad 入路治疗考沃德和豪厄尔 4 类无牙颌上颌骨的可行性:即刻负重的一种选择。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):800-808. doi: 10.1111/cid.13046. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
CHARACTERISATION OF RESORBABLE AND NON- RESORBABLE SUTURES COATED WITH Punica granatum SEED EXTRACT: AN in vitro PILOT STUDY.石榴籽提取物涂层可吸收缝线和不可吸收缝线的特性:一项体外初步研究。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024 Mar;24(1):101952. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101952. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
2
Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颧骨种植体的长期治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Jul 5;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x.
3
Zygoma implant under function: biomechanical principles clarified.
颧骨种植体的功能:生物力学原理的阐明。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Jun 22;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00483-1.
4
Comparison of treatment effects during en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth placed using mini-implants placed at infrazygomatic crest and interradicular sites: A randomized controlled trial.微种植体支抗于颧牙槽嵴和根间部位整体内收上前牙的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12679. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Dental patient-reported outcomes following traumatic dental injuries and treatment: A narrative review.创伤性牙外伤及治疗后患者报告的口腔结局:叙述性综述。
Dent Traumatol. 2023 Aug;39(4):304-313. doi: 10.1111/edt.12827. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
6
Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach.颧种植体植入的动态导航:一项比较无瓣法与传统方法的随机临床研究。
J Dent. 2023 Mar;130:104436. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104436. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Retrospective cohort assessment of survival and complications of zygomatic implants in atrophic maxillae.回顾性队列研究评估颧骨种植体在萎缩上颌骨中的生存和并发症。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Feb;34(2):148-156. doi: 10.1111/clr.14027. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
8
Comparison of two treatment protocols for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants : A prospective clinical trial.两种使用微型种植体治疗上颌前牙内收和压低的方案比较:一项前瞻性临床试验。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jan;85(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00394-7. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
9
ATM technique - a novel radiographic technique to assess the position of buccal shelf implants.ATM 技术——一种评估颊棚种植体位置的新型放射技术。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Jul 1;51(5):20210346. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210346. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
10
Crestal Bone Loss in Implants Postloading and Its Association with Age, Gender, and Implant Site: A Retrospective Study.种植体加载后嵴顶骨吸收及其与年龄、性别和种植部位的关系:一项回顾性研究
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):205-211. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035936.