免疫检查点抑制剂联合或不联合血管生成抑制剂的心血管毒性特征:基于 FAERS 数据库的 2014 年至 2022 年真实世界药物警戒分析。

Cardiovascular toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without angiogenesis inhibitors: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database from 2014 to 2022.

机构信息

Department of Comprehensive Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2023 May 24;14:1127128. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1127128. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) have become increasingly available for multiple types of cancers, although the cardiovascular safety profiles of this combination therapy in real-world settings have not been elucidated to date. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively investigate the cardiovascular toxicity profiles of ICIs combined with AGIs in comparison with ICIs alone.

METHODS

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the 1 quarter of 2014 to the 1 quarter of 2022 was retrospectively queried to extract reports of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with ICIs alone, AGIs alone and combination therapy. To perform disproportionality analysis, the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components (ICs) were calculated with statistical shrinkage transformation formulas and a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for ROR (ROR) > 1 or IC (IC) > 0 with at least 3 reports was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 18 854 cardiovascular AE cases/26 059 reports for ICIs alone, 47 168 cases/67 595 reports for AGIs alone, and 3 978 cases/5 263 reports for combination therapy were extracted. Compared to the entire database of patients without AGIs or ICIs, cardiovascular AEs were overreported in patients with combination therapy (IC/ROR = 0.559/1.478), showing stronger signal strength than those taking ICIs alone (IC/ROR = 0.118/1.086) or AGIs alone (IC/ROR = 0.323/1.252). Importantly, compared with ICIs alone, combination therapy showed a decrease in signal strength for noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (IC/ROR = 1.142/2.216 . IC/ROR = 0.673/1.614), while an increase in signal value for embolic and thrombotic events (IC/ROR = 0.147/1.111 . IC/ROR = 0.591/1.519). For outcomes of cardiovascular AEs, the frequency of death and life-threatening AEs was lower for combination therapy than ICIs alone in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (37.7% . 49.2%) as well as in embolic and thrombotic events (29.9% . 39.6%). Analysis among indications of cancer showed similar findings.

CONCLUSION

Overall, ICIs combined with AGIs showed a greater risk of cardiovascular AEs than ICIs alone, mainly due to an increase in embolic and thrombotic events while a decrease in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis. In addition, compared with ICIs alone, combination therapy presented a lower frequency of death and life-threatening in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis and embolic and thrombotic events.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合血管生成抑制剂(AGIs)已广泛应用于多种癌症,但在真实世界环境中,这种联合治疗的心血管安全性特征尚未阐明。因此,我们旨在全面研究 ICI 联合 AGI 与单独使用 ICI 相比的心血管毒性特征。

方法

回顾性检索 2014 年第 1 季度至 2022 年第 1 季度食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,提取与单独使用 ICI、AGI 及联合治疗相关的心血管不良事件(AE)报告。为了进行不相称性分析,使用统计收缩转换公式计算报告比值比(ROR)和信息分量(IC),并且认为 ROR > 1 或 IC > 0 的下限 95%置信区间(CI)至少有 3 个报告是具有统计学意义的。

结果

共提取了 18854 例心血管 AE 病例/26059 例报告用于单独使用 ICI,47168 例/67595 例报告用于单独使用 AGI,3978 例/5263 例报告用于联合治疗。与没有 AGI 或 ICI 的整个患者数据库相比,联合治疗患者心血管 AE 报告过度(IC/ROR = 0.559/1.478),信号强度强于单独使用 ICI(IC/ROR = 0.118/1.086)或单独使用 AGI(IC/ROR = 0.323/1.252)。重要的是,与单独使用 ICI 相比,联合治疗在非感染性心肌炎/心包炎(IC/ROR = 1.142/2.216,IC/ROR = 0.673/1.614)方面信号强度降低,而在栓塞和血栓形成事件(IC/ROR = 0.147/1.111,IC/ROR = 0.591/1.519)方面信号值增加。对于心血管 AE 的结局,与单独使用 ICI 相比,联合治疗在非感染性心肌炎/心包炎(37.7%/49.2%)以及栓塞和血栓形成事件(29.9%/39.6%)中的死亡率和危及生命的 AE 发生率较低。在癌症的适应证分析中也得出了类似的发现。

结论

总体而言,ICI 联合 AGI 比单独使用 ICI 发生心血管 AE 的风险更高,主要是由于栓塞和血栓形成事件增加,而非感染性心肌炎/心包炎减少。此外,与单独使用 ICI 相比,联合治疗在非感染性心肌炎/心包炎和栓塞及血栓形成事件中,死亡率和危及生命的 AE 发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b115/10244526/91e7ba9447dc/fimmu-14-1127128-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索