Warren Tracy L, Tubbs Justin D, Lesh Tyler A, Corona Mylena B, Pakzad Sarvenaz, Albuquerque Marina, Singh Praveena, Zarubin Vanessa, Morse Sarah, Sham Pak Chung, Carter Cameron S, Nord Alex S
UC Davis Center for Neuroscience.
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong.
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 15:2023.05.24.23290465. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.24.23290465.
A primary goal of psychiatry is to better understand the pathways that link genetic risk to psychiatric symptoms. Here, we tested association of diagnosis and endophenotypes with overall and neurotransmitter pathway-specific polygenic risk in patients with early-stage psychosis. Subjects included 206 demographically diverse cases with a psychotic disorder who underwent comprehensive psychiatric and neurological phenotyping and 115 matched controls. Following genotyping, we calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) using Psychiatric Genomics Consortium GWAS summary statistics. To test if overall genetic risk can be partitioned into affected neurotransmitter pathways, we calculated pathway PGSs (pPGSs) for SZ risk affecting each of four major neurotransmitter systems: glutamate, GABA, dopamine, and serotonin. Psychosis subjects had elevated SZ PGS versus controls; cases with SZ or BP diagnoses had stronger SZ or BP risk, respectively. There was no significant association within psychosis cases between individual symptom measures and overall PGS. However, neurotransmitter-specific pPGSs were moderately associated with specific endophenotypes; notably, glutamate was associated with SZ diagnosis and with deficits in cognitive control during task-based fMRI, while dopamine was associated with global functioning. Finally, unbiased endophenotype-driven clustering identified three diagnostically mixed case groups that separated on primary deficits of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, global functioning, and cognitive control. All clusters showed strong genome-wide risk. Cluster 2, characterized by deficits in cognitive control and negative symptoms, additionally showed specific risk concentrated in glutamatergic and GABAergic pathways. Due to the intensive characterization of our subjects, the present study was limited to a relatively small cohort. As such, results should be followed up with additional research at the population and mechanism level. Our study suggests pathway-based PGS analysis may be a powerful path forward to study genetic mechanisms driving psychiatric endophenotypes.
精神病学的一个主要目标是更好地理解将遗传风险与精神症状联系起来的途径。在此,我们测试了早期精神病患者的诊断及内表型与总体及神经递质途径特异性多基因风险之间的关联。研究对象包括206例患有精神障碍的不同人口统计学特征的病例,这些病例接受了全面的精神和神经表型分析,以及115例匹配的对照。基因分型后,我们使用精神病基因组学联盟全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总统计数据计算了精神分裂症(SZ)和双相情感障碍(BP)的多基因分数(PGS)。为了测试总体遗传风险是否可分为受影响的神经递质途径,我们计算了影响四个主要神经递质系统(谷氨酸、γ-氨基丁酸、多巴胺和5-羟色胺)中每一个的SZ风险的途径PGS(pPGS)。精神病患者的SZ PGS高于对照组;SZ或BP诊断的病例分别有更强的SZ或BP风险。在精神病病例中,个体症状测量与总体PGS之间没有显著关联。然而,神经递质特异性pPGS与特定内表型存在中度关联;值得注意的是,谷氨酸与SZ诊断以及基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间的认知控制缺陷相关,而多巴胺与整体功能相关。最后,无偏倚的内表型驱动聚类识别出三个诊断混合病例组,这些病例组在阳性症状、阴性症状、整体功能和认知控制的主要缺陷方面有所区分。所有聚类均显示出强烈的全基因组风险。以认知控制和阴性症状缺陷为特征的聚类2还显示出特定风险集中在谷氨酸能和γ-氨基丁酸能途径。由于我们对研究对象进行了深入的特征分析,本研究仅限于一个相对较小的队列。因此,结果应在人群和机制层面进行更多研究加以跟进。我们的研究表明,基于途径的PGS分析可能是研究驱动精神疾病内表型的遗传机制的有力途径。