Institute for Heart Research, Centre of Experimental Medicine Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Physiol Res. 2023 Jun 9;72(S1):S11-S22. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935019.
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) represents one of the forms of innate cardioprotection. While being effective in animal models, its application in humans has not been always beneficial, which might be attributed to the presence of various comorbidities, such as hypertension, or being related to the confounding factors, such as patients' sex and age. RIPC has been shown to mediate its cardioprotective effects through the activation of Reperfusion Injury Salvage Kinase (RISK) pathway in healthy animals, however, scarce evidence supports this effect of RIPC in the hearts of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, in particular, in relationship with aging. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of RIPC in male SHR rats of different age and to evaluate the role of RISK pathway in the effect of RIPC on cardiac ischemic tolerance. RIPC was performed using three cycles of inflation/deflation of the pressure cuff placed on the hind limb of anesthetized rats aged three, five and eight months. Subsequently, hearts were excised, Langendorff-perfused and exposed to 30-min global ischemia and 2-h reperfusion. Infarct-sparing and antiarrhythmic effects of RIPC were observed only in three and five months-old animals but not in eight months-old rats. Beneficial effects of RIPC were associated with increased activity of RISK and decreased apoptotic signaling only in three and five months-old animals. In conclusion, RIPC showed cardioprotective effects in SHR rats that were partially age-dependent and might be attributed to the differences in the activation of RISK pathway and various aspects of ischemia/reperfusion injury in aging animals.
远程缺血预处理 (RIPC) 是一种内源性心肌保护形式。虽然在动物模型中有效,但在人类中的应用并不总是有益的,这可能归因于存在各种合并症,如高血压,或者与混杂因素有关,如患者的性别和年龄。RIPC 已被证明通过在健康动物中激活再灌注损伤挽救激酶 (RISK) 途径来介导其心脏保护作用,然而,很少有证据支持 RIPC 在自发性高血压 (SHR) 大鼠心脏中的这种作用,特别是与衰老有关。本研究旨在研究 RIPC 在不同年龄雄性 SHR 大鼠中的有效性,并评估 RISK 途径在 RIPC 对心脏缺血耐受的作用中的作用。通过对麻醉大鼠后肢上的压力袖带进行三次充气/放气循环来进行 RIPC。随后,取出心脏,进行 Langendorff 灌流,并暴露于 30 分钟的整体缺血和 2 小时的再灌注。仅在 3 个月和 5 个月大的动物中观察到 RIPC 的梗死保护和抗心律失常作用,而在 8 个月大的大鼠中则没有。RIPC 的有益作用与 RISK 活性的增加和仅在 3 个月和 5 个月大的动物中凋亡信号的减少有关。总之,RIPC 在 SHR 大鼠中表现出心脏保护作用,这种作用部分依赖于年龄,可能归因于 RISK 途径的激活以及衰老动物中缺血/再灌注损伤的各个方面的差异。