• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分是经皮肾镜碎石术后脓毒症休克的更好预测指标:两项多中心前瞻性试验的二次分析。

Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Is a Better Predictor of Septic Shock After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Prospective Trials.

机构信息

University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):863-867. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0677.

DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0677
PMID:37294208
Abstract

Recent retrospective literature suggests that the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scoring tool is a potentially superior tool over use of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery. Here we examine use of qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock within data series collected prospectively on PCNL patients as part of a greater study of infectious complications. We performed a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter studies including PCNL patients across nine institutions. Clinical signs informing SIRS and qSOFA scores were collected no later than postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of SIRS and qSOFA (high-risk score of greater-or-equal to two points) in predicting admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for vasopressor support. A total of 218 cases at 9 institutions were analyzed. One patient required vasopressor support in the ICU. The sensitivity/specificity was 100%/72.4% (McNemar's test  < 0.001) for SIRS and was 100%/90.8% (McNemar's test  < 0.001) for qSOFA. Although positive predictive value for both qSOFA and SIRS in prediction of post-PCNL septic shock is low, prospectively collected data demonstrate use of qSOFA may offer greater specificity than SIRS criteria when predicting post-PCNL septic shock.

摘要

最近的回顾性文献表明,快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分工具可能优于使用全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准来预测经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)术后感染性休克。在这里,我们检查了 qSOFA 和 SIRS 在预测 PCNL 患者感染性并发症更大研究系列中前瞻性收集的数据系列中的感染性休克的应用。我们对包括 9 个机构的 PCNL 患者在内的两项前瞻性多中心研究进行了二次分析。告知 SIRS 和 qSOFA 评分的临床体征在术后第 1 天之前采集。主要结局是 SIRS 和 qSOFA(风险评分大于或等于 2 分)预测入住 ICU 接受升压支持的敏感性和特异性。对 9 个机构的 218 例病例进行了分析。1 例患者在 ICU 需要升压支持。SIRS 的敏感性/特异性为 100%/72.4%(McNemar 检验 < 0.001),qSOFA 为 100%/90.8%(McNemar 检验 < 0.001)。尽管 qSOFA 和 SIRS 对预测 PCNL 后感染性休克的阳性预测值均较低,但前瞻性收集的数据表明,qSOFA 在预测 PCNL 后感染性休克时可能比 SIRS 标准具有更高的特异性。

相似文献

1
Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Is a Better Predictor of Septic Shock After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Prospective Trials.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分是经皮肾镜碎石术后脓毒症休克的更好预测指标:两项多中心前瞻性试验的二次分析。
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):863-867. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0677.
2
Performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.SOFA、qSOFA 和 SIRS 预测经皮肾镜取石术后脓毒性休克的表现。
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):501-510. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03183-2. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
3
Predictive accuracy of the modified SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.改良 SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对微创经皮肾取石术后尿脓毒症性休克的预测准确性。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01318-1. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
Use of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission Due to Septic Shock after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Multicenter Study.经皮肾镜碎石术后脓毒性休克导致入住重症监护病房的预测:使用快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分的多中心研究。
J Urol. 2019 Aug;202(2):314-318. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000195. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
The value of IL-6, PCT, qSOFA, NEWS, and SIRS to predict septic shock after Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.白细胞介素-6、降钙素原、快速序贯器官衰竭评估、新苏格兰临床评分和全身炎症反应综合征对经皮肾镜碎石术后脓毒性休克的预测价值。
BMC Urol. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01502-y.
6
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Combined with Pre- and Postoperative White Blood Cell Ratio Is a Better Criterion to Identify Septic Shock Patients After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.全身炎症反应综合征联合术前和术后白细胞比值是鉴别软性输尿管镜碎石术后脓毒性休克患者的更好标准。
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):973-978. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1002. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
7
Development and validation of the UCSS score, a novel method to predict septic shock after PCNL.经皮肾镜碎石术后预测脓毒性休克的新型评分方法 UCSS 的开发与验证。
World J Urol. 2023 Jul;41(7):1921-1927. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04426-8. Epub 2023 May 27.
8
Predicting Septic Shock After Emergent Ureteral Stenting in Stone-Related Obstruction and Presumed Infections.预测急诊输尿管支架置入术后与结石相关梗阻和疑似感染所致的感染性休克。
J Endourol. 2023 Feb;37(2):127-132. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0200.
9
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
10
[Diagnosis accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score for adult sepsis patient with soft tissue infection].[快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对成人软组织感染性脓毒症患者的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Aug;31(8):933-937. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.08.004.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/neutrophil ratio, and risk of urosepsis in patients who present with ureteral stones and suspected urinary tract infection.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、血小板/中性粒细胞比值与输尿管结石伴疑似尿路感染患者尿脓毒症风险的关系。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 28;42(1):596. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05229-1.