• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么法国在药品上的支出比美国少:药品定价和定价监管的比较研究。

Why France Spends Less Than the United States on Drugs: A Comparative Study of Drug Pricing and Pricing Regulation.

机构信息

Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):240-272. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12507.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12507
PMID:33751664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984670/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Policy Points  Spending on prescription drugs is much higher per capita in the United States than in most other industrialized nations, including France.  Lower prescription drug spending in France is due to different approaches to managing drug prices, volume of prescribing, and global health budgets.  Linking a drug's price to value both at the launch of the drug and over its lifetime is key to controlling spending. Regulations on prescription volume and global spending complement the interventions on prices.  If the United States adopted the French approach to regulating drug pricing, Medicare could potentially save billions of dollars annually on prescription drug spending.

CONTEXT

Prescription drug spending per capita in the United States is higher than in most other industrialized countries. Policymakers seeking to lower drug spending often suggest benchmarking prices against other countries, including France, which spends half as much as the United States per capita on prescription drugs. Because differences in drug prices may result from how markets are organized in each nation, we sought to directly compare drug prices and pricing regulations between the United States and France.

METHODS

For the six brand-name drugs with the highest gross expenditures in Medicare Part D in 2017, we compared the price dynamics in France and the United States between 2010 and 2018 and analyzed associations between price changes in each country and key regulatory events. We also comprehensively reviewed US and French laws and regulations related to drug pricing.

FINDINGS

Prices for the six drugs studied were higher in the United States than in France. In 2018, if Medicare had paid French prices for the brand-name drugs in our cohort, the agency would have saved $5.1 billion. We identified 12 factors that explain why the United States spends more than France on drugs, including variations in unit prices and the volume of prescriptions, driven by use of health technology assessment and value-based pricing in France.

CONCLUSIONS

Key drivers of lower drug spending in France compared to the United States are that the French government regulates drug prices when products are launched and prohibits substantial price increases after launch. The regulation of prescription drugs in France is governed by rules that can inform discussions of US prescription drug policy and potential Medicare price negotiations.

摘要

目的:处方药品的人均支出在美国远高于其他大多数工业化国家,包括法国。法国的处方药品人均支出较低,是因为在药品价格管理、处方量和全球卫生预算方面采取了不同的方法。在药品推出时及其整个生命周期内将药品价格与其价值挂钩是控制支出的关键。对处方量和全球支出的监管补充了对价格的干预措施。如果美国采用法国的药品定价监管方法,医疗保险每年在处方药品支出方面可能会节省数十亿美元。

背景:美国的人均处方药支出高于大多数其他工业化国家。寻求降低药品支出的政策制定者经常建议将价格与其他国家(包括法国)进行基准比较,因为法国的人均处方药支出仅为美国的一半。由于药品价格的差异可能源于每个国家的市场组织方式不同,我们试图直接比较美国和法国的药品价格和定价法规。

方法:对于 2017 年医疗保险部分 D 中支出最高的六种品牌药品,我们比较了 2010 年至 2018 年期间法国和美国的价格动态,并分析了每个国家的价格变化与关键监管事件之间的关联。我们还全面审查了美国和法国与药品定价相关的法律和法规。

发现:在所研究的六种药品中,美国的价格高于法国。如果医疗保险在 2018 年按照我们研究队列中的品牌药品的法国价格支付,该机构将节省 51 亿美元。我们确定了 12 个因素,解释了为什么美国在药品上的支出高于法国,包括单位价格和处方量的差异,这是由法国使用卫生技术评估和基于价值的定价驱动的。

结论:与美国相比,法国药品支出较低的主要原因是法国政府在药品推出时监管药品价格,并禁止推出后大幅提价。法国的处方药监管受规则管辖,这些规则可以为美国处方药政策的讨论和潜在的医疗保险价格谈判提供信息。

相似文献

1
Why France Spends Less Than the United States on Drugs: A Comparative Study of Drug Pricing and Pricing Regulation.为什么法国在药品上的支出比美国少:药品定价和定价监管的比较研究。
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):240-272. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12507.
2
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform.美国处方药价格居高不下:根源与改革前景。
JAMA. 2016;316(8):858-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11237.
3
Pursuing Value-Based Prices for Drugs: A Comprehensive Comparison of State Prescription Drug-Pricing Boards.追求基于价值的药品价格:州处方药定价委员会的综合比较。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1162-1197. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12533. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
4
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
5
Patient and Payer Incentives to Use Patented Brand-Name Drugs vs Authorized Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险计划 D 中患者和付款人的专利品牌药与授权仿制药使用激励因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1605-1611. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5997.
6
Estimates of Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Net Prices of Top-Selling Brand-name Drugs Incorporating Best Price Rebates, 2015 to 2019.2015 年至 2019 年,纳入最佳价格回扣的畅销品牌药的医疗补助和非医疗补助净价估计。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jan 6;4(1):e225012. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5012.
7
Role of Specialty Drugs in Rising Drug Prices for Medicare Part D.特殊药物在医疗保险处方药部分药物价格上涨中的作用。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 May 3;5(5):e241188. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1188.
8
Higher US branded drug prices and spending compared to other countries may stem partly from quick uptake of new drugs.与其他国家相比,美国的品牌药物价格更高,支出也更多,这可能部分源于新药的快速普及。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):753-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0920.
9
International Reference Pricing for Prescription Drugs in the United States: Administrative Limitations and Collateral Effects.美国处方药国际参考定价:行政限制与附带影响。
Value Health. 2021 Apr;24(4):473-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
10
Brand Medications and Medicare Part D: How Eye Care Providers' Prescribing Patterns Influence Costs.品牌药物和医疗保险部分 D:眼科护理提供者的处方模式如何影响成本。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.关于潜在创新型卫生技术的价格决定因素及定价政策:一项范围综述
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01834-y.
2
Added Therapeutic Benefits of Top-Selling Drugs in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Health Technology Assessment.日本畅销药物的额外治疗益处:一项使用卫生技术评估的横断面研究
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70243. doi: 10.1111/cts.70243.
3
Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.长期使用高成本药物带来的经济挑战。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Dec 3;12(Suppl 1):i49-i58. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae098. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
A Comparative Analysis of International Drug Price Negotiation Frameworks: An Interview Study of Key Stakeholders.国际药品价格谈判框架的比较分析:关键利益相关者访谈研究
Milbank Q. 2024 Dec;102(4):1004-1031. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12714. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
5
Global Barriers to Accessing Off-Patent Endocrine Therapies: A Renaissance of the Orphan Disease?全球获取非专利内分泌治疗药物的障碍:孤儿病的复兴?
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Apr 19;109(5):e1379-e1388. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad610.
6
Added Therapeutic Benefit of Top-Selling Brand-name Drugs in Medicare.增加了医疗保险中最畅销的品牌药物的治疗效益。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1283-1289. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4034.
7
Role of Economic Evaluations on Pricing of Medicines Reimbursed by the Italian National Health Service.经济评估在意大利国家卫生服务体系报销药品定价中的作用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jan;41(1):107-117. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01215-w. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
Medication Non-Adherence in Rheumatology, Oncology and Cardiology: A Review of the Literature of Risk Factors and Potential Interventions.风湿病学、肿瘤学和心脏病学中的药物不依从:文献中风险因素和潜在干预措施的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;19(19):12036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912036.
9
Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals in High-Income Countries: A Comparative Analysis.高收入国家药品强制许可:比较分析。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):284-313. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12557. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer Comparisons for Drug Price Setting: Why International Reference Pricing May Not Provide Optimal Prices.药品定价的同行比较:为何国际参考定价可能无法提供最优价格。
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Feb 3;1(2):e200105. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0105.
2
Drug Prices, Rebates, and Discounts.药品价格、回扣与折扣
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):399. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7983.
3
Changes in List Prices, Net Prices, and Discounts for Branded Drugs in the US, 2007-2018.2007-2018 年美国品牌药物的目录价格、净价格和折扣变化。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):854-862. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1012.
4
Decreasing Medicare Spending on Prescription Drugs.减少医疗保险在处方药上的支出。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):601. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7064.
5
Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence.同类别品牌药物之间的竞争与价格:证据的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 30;16(7):e1002872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002872. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Price Increases of Protected-Class Drugs in Medicare Part D, Relative to Inflation, 2012-2017.医疗保险处方药部分中受保护药物的价格相对于通货膨胀的增长,2012-2017 年。
JAMA. 2019 Jul 16;322(3):267-269. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7521.
7
America's Health Care System is Broken: What Went Wrong and How We Can Fix It. Part 4: The Pharmaceutical Industry.美国的医疗保健系统已经崩溃:问题出在哪里以及我们如何解决它。第 4 部分:制药行业。
Am J Med. 2019 Sep;132(9):1013-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Generic Price Competition For Specialty Drugs: Too Little, Too Late?专利药的仿制药价格竞争:为时过晚?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):738-742. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1684.
9
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
10
Prices of Generic Drugs Associated with Numbers of Manufacturers.与制造商数量相关的仿制药价格。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2597-2598. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1711899.