• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰和威尔士 PSA 检测对二级医疗保健费用的影响:来自前列腺癌 PSA 检测(CAP)集群随机试验的估计。

Impact of PSA testing on secondary care costs in England and Wales: estimates from the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP).

机构信息

Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.

Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09503-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09503-7
PMID:37296430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10257301/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening men for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains controversial. We aimed to estimate the likely budgetary impact on secondary care in England and Wales to inform screening decision makers.

METHODS

The Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer study (CAP) compared a single invitation to men aged 50-69 for a PSA test with usual care (no screening). Routinely collected hospital care data were obtained for all men in CAP, and NHS reference costs were mapped to each event via Healthcare Resource Group (HRG) codes. Secondary-care costs per man per year were calculated, and cost differences (and population-level estimates) between arms were derived annually for the first five years following randomisation.

RESULTS

In the first year post-randomisation, secondary-care costs averaged across all men (irrespective of a prostate cancer diagnosis) in the intervention arm (n = 189279) were £44.80 (95% confidence interval: £18.30-£71.30) higher than for men in the control arm (n = 219357). Extrapolated to a population level, the introduction of a single PSA screening invitation could lead to additional secondary care costs of £314 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing a single PSA screening test for men aged 50-69 across England and Wales could lead to very high initial secondary-care costs.

摘要

背景

使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测对前列腺癌进行男性筛查仍然存在争议。我们旨在评估这对英国和威尔士二级保健的可能预算影响,为筛查决策者提供信息。

方法

Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer study(CAP)研究比较了对 50-69 岁男性进行一次 PSA 检测的单一邀请与常规护理(无筛查)。对 CAP 中的所有男性均获得了常规收集的医院护理数据,并通过医疗保健资源组(HRG)代码将 NHS 参考成本映射到每个事件。计算了每位男性每年的二级保健费用,并在随机分组后的前五年每年计算了两组之间的费用差异(和人群水平估计值)。

结果

在随机分组后的第一年,干预组(n=189279)中所有男性(无论是否患有前列腺癌)的二级保健费用平均为 £44.80(95%置信区间:£18.30-£71.30),高于对照组(n=219357)。在人群水平上推算,引入单次 PSA 筛查可能会导致额外的二级保健费用 3.14 亿英镑。

结论

在英格兰和威尔士为 50-69 岁男性引入单次 PSA 筛查测试可能会导致初始二级保健费用非常高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970c/10257301/b93e822f4610/12913_2023_9503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970c/10257301/b93e822f4610/12913_2023_9503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970c/10257301/b93e822f4610/12913_2023_9503_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of PSA testing on secondary care costs in England and Wales: estimates from the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP).英格兰和威尔士 PSA 检测对二级医疗保健费用的影响:来自前列腺癌 PSA 检测(CAP)集群随机试验的估计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09503-7.
2
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and 15-Year Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.前列腺特异性抗原筛查与 15 年前列腺癌死亡率:CAP 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA. 2024 May 7;331(17):1460-1470. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4011.
3
Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP).《前列腺癌 PSA 检测的集群随机试验(CAP)设计和初步招募结果》。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jun 10;110(12):2829-36. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.242. Epub 2014 May 27.
4
Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening: a cohort study in England, 1998-2017.基于队列的英格兰地区研究 1998-2017:前列腺特异性抗原检测与机会性前列腺癌筛查
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jan 28;71(703):e157-e165. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713957. Print 2021.
5
Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.基于低强度前列腺特异性抗原的筛查干预对前列腺癌死亡率的影响:CAP随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):883-895. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0154.
6
Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.前列腺癌的知情决策与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测:一项随机对照试验,探讨简短患者决策辅助工具对男性关于检测的知识、态度及意愿的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):367-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
7
Validating the use of Hospital Episode Statistics data and comparison of costing methodologies for economic evaluation: an end-of-life case study from the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP).验证医院诊疗统计数据的使用及经济评估成本核算方法的比较:前列腺癌PSA检测整群随机试验(CAP)的终末期病例研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e011063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011063.
8
Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.主动监测、根治性前列腺切除术和根治性放疗在 PSA 检测到的局限性前列腺癌中的应用:ProtecT 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(37):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24370.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of PSA-based mass screening: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial combined with register data.基于 PSA 的大规模筛查的成本效益分析:一项随机对照试验与登记数据相结合的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 5;14(11):e0224479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224479. eCollection 2019.
10
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Economic Analysis.基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的前列腺癌人群筛查:一项经济学分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015 May 1;15(11):1-37. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles in the Diagnosis and Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.尿细胞外囊泡在前列腺癌诊断及主动监测中的应用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;16(9):1717. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091717.

本文引用的文献

1
Budget Impact Model for the Use of PCA3 Urine Testing in Prostate Cancer Screening.用于前列腺癌筛查的PCA3尿液检测的预算影响模型
Urol Pract. 2015 Nov;2(6):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in the UK: A Decision Model Analysis Based on the CAP Trial.英国前列腺癌筛查的成本效益分析:基于 CAP 试验的决策模型分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(12):1207-1220. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01191-1. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Models in Prostate Cancer: Exploring New Developments in Testing and Diagnosis.
前列腺癌成本效益模型的系统评价:探索检测和诊断的新进展。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
An Evidence Review of Low-Value Care Recommendations: Inconsistency and Lack of Economic Evidence Considered.低价值医疗建议的证据回顾:考虑到不一致性和缺乏经济证据。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3448-3455. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06639-2. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Health care costs of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer care by clinical stage and cost component.按临床分期和费用构成划分的乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌的医疗保健费用。
Gac Sanit. 2022 May-Jun;36(3):246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.035. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Modelling the lifetime cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active monitoring for men with clinically localised prostate cancer from median 10-year outcomes in the ProtecT randomised trial.基于 ProtecT 随机试验中 10 年中期结果,对局限性前列腺癌男性行根治性前列腺切除术、放疗和主动监测的终生成本效益建模。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):971. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07276-4.
7
The ProtecT randomised trial cost-effectiveness analysis comparing active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌主动监测、手术与放疗的 ProtecT 随机临床试验成本效果分析
Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(7):1063-1070. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0978-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
A discussion on controversies and ethical dilemmas in prostate cancer screening.关于前列腺癌筛查中的争议与伦理困境的讨论。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105979.
9
'Not clinically effective but cost-effective' - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with 'doubly null' results: a cross-sectional study.“无临床疗效但具有成本效益”——具有“双重无效”结果的随机对照试验中的矛盾结论:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e029596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of PSA-based mass screening: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial combined with register data.基于 PSA 的大规模筛查的成本效益分析:一项随机对照试验与登记数据相结合的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 5;14(11):e0224479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224479. eCollection 2019.