Moustafa Ibrahim M, Shousha Tamer, Arumugam Ashokan, Harrison Deed E
Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, RIMHS-Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.
J Clin Med. 2023 May 27;12(11):3707. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113707.
There is great interest in thoracic kyphosis, as it is thought to be a contributor to neck pain, neck disability, and sensorimotor control measures; however, this has not been completely investigated in treatment or case control studies. This case control design investigated participants with non-specific chronic neck pain. Eighty participants with a defined hyper-kyphosis (>55°) were compared to eighty matched participants with normal thoracic kyphosis (<55°). Participants were matched for age and neck pain duration. Hyper-kyphosis was further categorized into two distinct types: postural kyphosis (PK) and Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK). Posture measures included formetric thoracic kyphosis and the craniovertebral angle (CVA) to assess forward head posture. Sensorimotor control was assessed by the following measures: smooth pursuit neck torsion test (SPNT), overall stability index (OSI), and left and right rotation repositioning accuracy. A measure of autonomic nervous system function included the amplitude and latency of skin sympathetic response (SSR). Differences in variable measures were examined using the Student's -test to compare the means of continuous variables between the two groups. One-way ANOVA was used to compare mean values in the three groups: postural kyphosis, Scheuermann's kyphosis, and normal kyphosis group. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between participant's thoracic kyphosis magnitude (in each group separately and as an entire population) and their CVA, SPNT, OSI, head repositioning accuracy, and SSR latency and amplitude. Hyper-kyphosis participants had a significantly greater neck disability index compared to the normal kyphosis group ( < 0.001) with the SK group having greatest disability ( < 0.001). Statistically significant differences between the two kyphosis groups and the normal kyphosis group for all the sensorimotor measured variables were identified with the SK group having the most decreased efficiency of the measures in the hyper-kyphosis group, including: SPNT, OSI, and left and right rotation repositioning accuracy. In addition, there was a significant difference in neurophysiological findings for SSR amplitude (entire sample of kyphosis vs. normal kyphosis, < 0.001), but there was no significant difference for SSR latency ( = 0.07). The CVA was significantly greater in the hyper-kyphosis group ( < 0.001). The magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis correlated with worsening CVA (with the SK group having the smallest CVA; < 0.001) and the magnitude of the decreased efficiency of the sensorimotor control measures and the amplitude and latency of the SSR. The PK group, overall, showed the greatest correlations between thoracic kyphosis and measured variables. Participants with hyper-thoracic kyphosis exhibited abnormal sensorimotor control and autonomic nervous system dysfunction compared to those with normal thoracic kyphosis.
胸椎后凸受到了极大关注,因为它被认为是导致颈部疼痛、颈部功能障碍和感觉运动控制指标出现问题的一个因素;然而,在治疗或病例对照研究中尚未对此进行全面调查。本病例对照研究设计对患有非特异性慢性颈部疼痛的参与者进行了调查。将80名确定为胸椎后凸过大(>55°)的参与者与80名匹配的胸椎后凸正常(<55°)的参与者进行比较。参与者在年龄和颈部疼痛持续时间方面进行了匹配。胸椎后凸过大进一步分为两种不同类型:姿势性后凸(PK)和休曼氏后凸(SK)。姿势测量包括测量胸椎后凸和颅椎角(CVA)以评估头部前倾姿势。感觉运动控制通过以下指标进行评估:平稳跟踪颈部扭转试验(SPNT)、整体稳定性指数(OSI)以及左右旋转重新定位准确性。自主神经系统功能的一项指标包括皮肤交感反应(SSR)的幅度和潜伏期。使用学生t检验来检查变量测量值的差异,以比较两组之间连续变量的均值。单向方差分析用于比较姿势性后凸、休曼氏后凸和正常后凸三组的均值。皮尔逊相关性用于评估参与者的胸椎后凸程度(分别在每组以及作为一个整体人群)与他们的CVA、SPNT、OSI、头部重新定位准确性以及SSR潜伏期和幅度之间的关系。与正常后凸组相比,胸椎后凸过大的参与者颈部功能障碍指数显著更高(<0.001),其中SK组的功能障碍最为严重(<0.001)。在所有测量的感觉运动变量方面,两种后凸组与正常后凸组之间均存在统计学上的显著差异,其中SK组在胸椎后凸过大组中各项指标的效率下降最为明显,这些指标包括:SPNT、OSI以及左右旋转重新定位准确性。此外,SSR幅度的神经生理学结果存在显著差异(后凸组与正常后凸组的整个样本相比,<0.001),但SSR潜伏期没有显著差异(=0.07)。胸椎后凸过大组的CVA显著更大(<0.001)。胸椎后凸的程度与CVA恶化相关(SK组的CVA最小;<0.001),也与感觉运动控制措施效率下降的程度以及SSR的幅度和潜伏期相关。总体而言,PK组在胸椎后凸与测量变量之间显示出最强的相关性。与胸椎后凸正常的参与者相比,胸椎后凸过大的参与者表现出异常的感觉运动控制和自主神经系统功能障碍。