Marx-Gross Susanne, Kroell Angelina, Wollschlaeger Daniel, Schuster Alexander K, Riedl Jana C, Wasielica-Poslednik Joanna, Pfeiffer Norbert
Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Artemis MVZ Wiesbaden, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 3;12(11):3833. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113833.
To evaluate the effect of crosslinking (CXL) with riboflavin for keratoconus (KC) therapy on quality of life (QoL): comparison of keratoconus patients with and without treatment.
Prospective monocentric study. We recruited patients with progressive KC and with stable disease. Patients with progressive disease received cross-linking treatment; patients with stable disease were monitored. We compared QoL in both groups over 6 months and detected the influence of cross-linking treatment on QoL. QoL was assessed by NEI-VFQ-25, EQ-5D 5L, and EQ-Visual analog scale (VAS). In the evaluation of the Nei VFQ, the subgroups LFVFS and LFSES were calculated.
We enrolled 31 eyes of 31 patients in the intervention group and 37 eyes of 37 patients in the control group. Medians with standard deviations (SD) were calculated. All QoL-tests showed equal scores at baseline in both groups. At V2, one day after the treatment, EQ-VAS (56.4), LFVFS (57.4), and EQ5D5L (0.59) were significantly reduced. At V3 (one week after treatment), all results returned to baseline level. LFSES was not affected by the treatment. It remained stable (V2 85.4, V3 84.3). Comparing the baseline scores with the follow-up scores at month 6, we found a significant increase in QoL in all tests in the intervention group. Otherwise, the quality of life in the control group did not change over time.
Cross-linking led only to a short-term reduction in QoL. Although the treatment is painful for a few days, no effect on general quality of life LVSES has been demonstrated. QoL already returned to baseline after one week and the patients were not limited anymore.
评估核黄素交联(CXL)治疗圆锥角膜(KC)对生活质量(QoL)的影响:对比接受和未接受治疗的圆锥角膜患者。
前瞻性单中心研究。我们招募了病情进展期和病情稳定期的KC患者。病情进展期患者接受交联治疗;病情稳定期患者接受监测。我们比较了两组患者6个月内的生活质量,并检测交联治疗对生活质量的影响。生活质量通过NEI-VFQ-25、EQ-5D 5L和EQ视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。在评估Nei VFQ时,计算了LFVFS和LFSES亚组。
干预组纳入31例患者的31只眼,对照组纳入37例患者的37只眼。计算了中位数及标准差(SD)。所有生活质量测试在两组基线时均显示得分相同。在V2,即治疗后一天,EQ-VAS(56.4)、LFVFS(57.4)和EQ5D5L(0.59)显著降低。在V3(治疗后一周),所有结果均恢复至基线水平。LFSES未受治疗影响,保持稳定(V2为85.4,V3为84.3)。将基线得分与第6个月的随访得分进行比较,我们发现干预组所有测试中的生活质量均显著提高。否则,对照组的生活质量随时间未发生变化。
交联仅导致生活质量短期下降。尽管治疗在几天内会带来疼痛,但未证明对总体生活质量LVSES有影响。一周后生活质量已恢复至基线,患者不再受限。