Komp Martin, Ruetten Sebastian
Center for Spine Surgery and Pain Therapy, Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology of the St. Elisabeth Group - Catholic Hospitals Rhein-Ruhr, St. Anna Hospital Herne/Marien Hospital Herne University Hospital of the Ruhr University of Bochum/Marien Hospital Witten, Hospitalstrasse 19, 44649, Herne, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2685-2693. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07807-0. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
Operations on thoracic herniated discs are comparatively rare and often demanding. An individual approach and mastery of different surgical techniques and surgical approaches are necessary. The main factors for the chosen surgical technique and approach are the anatomical localization, consistency of the pathology, the general condition of the patient and the experience of the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical possibilities and outcomes of the full-endoscopic technique with interlaminar, extraforaminal and transthoracic retropleural approaches in patients with symptomatic herniated discs with anterior neural compression.
In 49 patients with thoracic disc herniations, decompression was performed between 2016 and 2020, using a full-endoscopic interlaminar, extraforaminal or transthoracic retropleural approach. Clinical data and imaging were collected during follow-up of 18 months.
Sufficient decompression was achieved in all cases with the full-endoscopic surgical technique. Two patients experienced worsening of myelopathy, one of which was of transient duration, and one patient required reoperation for an epidural hematoma. No other complications were recorded. All other patients experienced a regression or improvement of symptoms.
The full-endoscopic technique with interlaminar, extraforaminal or transthoracic retropleural approach is a sufficient and minimally invasive method. All three full-endoscopic approaches of the thoracic spine are required to enable sufficient decompression of the anterior pathologies examined here.
胸椎椎间盘突出症的手术相对少见且难度较大。需要采用个体化方法并掌握不同的手术技术和手术入路。选择手术技术和入路的主要因素包括解剖定位、病变的特征、患者的一般状况以及外科医生的经验。本研究的目的是评估全内镜技术经椎板间、椎间孔外和经胸后纵隔入路治疗有症状的伴有前方神经受压的椎间盘突出症患者的技术可行性和疗效。
2016年至2020年期间,对49例胸椎椎间盘突出症患者采用全内镜椎板间、椎间孔外或经胸后纵隔入路进行减压。在18个月的随访期间收集临床数据和影像学资料。
采用全内镜手术技术在所有病例中均实现了充分减压。2例患者脊髓病加重,其中1例为短暂性加重,1例患者因硬膜外血肿需要再次手术。未记录其他并发症。所有其他患者症状均有减轻或改善。
全内镜技术经椎板间、椎间孔外或经胸后纵隔入路是一种充分且微创的方法。胸椎的所有三种全内镜入路对于此处所检查的前方病变实现充分减压都是必需的。