Yoshida Shohei, Nakata Tomoaki, Naya Masanao, Momose Mitsuru, Taniguchi Yasuyo, Fukushima Yoshimitsu, Moroi Masao, Okizaki Atsutaka, Hashimoto Akiyoshi, Kiko Takatoyo, Hida Satoshi, Takehana Kazuya, Nakajima Kenichi
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Kanazawa Japan.
Cardiology, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital Hakodate Japan.
Circ Rep. 2023 Apr 28;5(6):252-259. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0031. eCollection 2023 Jun 9.
Definitions of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) differ among guidelines. Any systemic histological finding of CS is essential for the diagnosis of CS in the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society statement, but not necessary in the Japanese Circulation Society 2016 guidelines. This study aimed to reveal the differences in outcomes by comparing 2 groups, namely CS patients with or without systemic histologically proven granuloma. This study retrospectively included 231 consecutive patients with CS. CS with granulomas in ≥1 organs was diagnosed in 131 patients (Group G), whereas CS without any granulomas was diagnosed in the remaining 100 patients (Group NG). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly reduced in Group NG compared with Group G (44±13% vs. 50±16%, respectively; P=0.001). However, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.167). Univariable analyses showed that significant predictors of MACE were Groups G/NG, histological CS, LVEF, and high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro BNP concentrations, but none of these was significant in multivariable analyses. Overall risks of MACE were similar between the 2 groups despite different manifestations in cardiac dysfunction. The data not only validate the prognostic value of non-invasive diagnosis of CS, but also show the need for careful observation and therapeutic strategy in patients with CS without any granuloma.
心脏结节病(CS)的定义在不同指南中存在差异。在2014年心律协会声明中,CS的任何系统性组织学发现对于CS的诊断至关重要,但在日本循环协会2016年指南中并非必要条件。本研究旨在通过比较两组患者,即有或无系统性组织学证实肉芽肿的CS患者,揭示其预后差异。本研究回顾性纳入了231例连续的CS患者。131例患者被诊断为≥1个器官有肉芽肿的CS(G组),而其余100例患者被诊断为无任何肉芽肿的CS(NG组)。与G组相比,NG组的左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著降低(分别为44±13%和50±16%;P = 0.001)。然而,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示两组间无主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的生存结局具有可比性(对数秩检验P = 0.167)。单因素分析显示,MACE的显著预测因素为G/NG组、组织学CS、LVEF以及高B型利钠肽(BNP)或N末端前BNP浓度,但在多因素分析中这些因素均无显著性。尽管两组心脏功能障碍表现不同,但MACE的总体风险相似。这些数据不仅验证了CS非侵入性诊断的预后价值,还表明对于无任何肉芽肿的CS患者需要仔细观察和制定治疗策略。