• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受教育程度与对科学和科学家的信任呈正相关,但这种相关性在腐败程度较高的国家较弱。

The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries.

机构信息

Yasar University, Turkey.

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jan;33(1):2-19. doi: 10.1177/09636625231176935. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/09636625231176935
PMID:37306012
Abstract

One of the most prominent correlates of trust in science and scientists is education level, possibly because educated individuals have higher levels of science knowledge and thinking ability, suggesting that trusting science and scientists relies more on reflective thinking abilities. However, it is relatively more reasonable for highly educated individuals to suspect authority figures in highly corrupt countries. We tested this prediction in two nationally representative and probabilistic cross-cultural data sets (Study 1: 142 countries, = 40,085; Study 2: 47 countries, = 69,332), and found that the positive association between education and trust in scientists (Study 1) and science (Study 2) was weaker or non-existent in highly corrupt countries. The results did not change after statistically controlling for age, sex, household income, and residence. We suggest future research to be more considerate of the societal context in understanding how education status correlates with trust in science and scientists.

摘要

信任科学和科学家的一个最突出的相关因素是教育水平,这可能是因为受过教育的人具有更高的科学知识和思维能力,这表明信任科学和科学家更多地依赖于反思性思维能力。然而,在高度腐败的国家中,受过高等教育的人更有可能怀疑权威人士。我们在两个具有全国代表性和概率性的跨文化数据集(研究 1:142 个国家,n=40085;研究 2:47 个国家,n=69332)中检验了这一预测,发现教育与对科学家(研究 1)和科学(研究 2)的信任之间的正相关关系在高度腐败的国家中较弱或不存在。在经过统计学控制年龄、性别、家庭收入和居住地后,结果并未改变。我们建议未来的研究更要考虑社会背景,以了解教育程度如何与对科学和科学家的信任相关联。

相似文献

1
The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries.受教育程度与对科学和科学家的信任呈正相关,但这种相关性在腐败程度较高的国家较弱。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jan;33(1):2-19. doi: 10.1177/09636625231176935. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism.科学与社会中的尊重与决策:科学权威的尊重如何超越对科学和科学家的信心,进而演变成威权主义。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Nov;29(8):800-818. doi: 10.1177/0963662520962741. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
The Problem of Trust Without Intimacy: Education for Handling Expert Knowledge in a Neoliberal Marketplace.无亲密感的信任问题:在新自由主义市场中处理专业知识的教育。
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(6):1449-1474. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00329-z. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
4
Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence.信任科学、社会共识和疫苗信心。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1528-1534. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.科学信任差距:2014 年美国的科学教育、对科学方法的信任和对科学机构的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
6
Scientists' and science writers' experiences reporting genetic discoveries: toward an ethic of trust in science journalism.科学家与科学作家报道基因发现的经历:迈向科学新闻报道中的信任伦理。
Genet Med. 2005 Mar;7(3):198-205. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000156699.78856.23.
7
The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.利益冲突对科学信任的影响。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):413-20. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0063-9.
8
Trusted online sources of health information: differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation.可靠的在线健康信息来源:人口统计学、健康观念和健康信息取向的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e21. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e21. Epub 2003 Sep 25.
9
Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative.洛杉矶一所大型多元化大学的学生、教职员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间对科学和科学家的信任,特洛伊大流行应对倡议。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15533-x.
10
Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities.光谱的两端:探究对科学权威和宗教权威的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Jan;27(1):11-28. doi: 10.1177/0963662516661090. Epub 2016 Jul 25.