Institute of Inorganic und Analytical Chemistry, Corrensstraße 48, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Bruker Daltonics GmbH & Co. KG, Fahrenheitstraße 4, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Anal Chem. 2023 Jun 27;95(25):9488-9496. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00440. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
The parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF) approach based on trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS) enables mobility-resolved fragmentation and a higher number of fragments in the same time period compared to conventional MS/MS experiments. Furthermore, the ion mobility dimension offers novel approaches for fragmentation. Using parallel reaction monitoring (prm), the ion mobility dimension allows a more accurate selection of precursor windows, while using data-independent aquisition (dia) spectral quality is improved through ion-mobility filtering. Owing to favorable implementation in proteomics, the transferability of these PASEF modes to lipidomics is of great interest, especially as a result of the high complexity of analytes with similar fragments. However, these novel PASEF modes have not yet been thoroughly evaluated for lipidomics applications. Therefore, data-dependent acquisition (dda)-, dia-, and prm-PASEF were compared using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) for phospholipid class separation in human plasma samples. Results show that all three PASEF modes are generally suitable for usage in lipidomics. Although dia-PASEF achieves a high sensitivity in generating MS/MS spectra, the fragment-to-precursor assignment for lipids with both, similar retention time as well as ion mobility, was difficult in HILIC-MS/MS. Therefore, dda-PASEF is the method of choice to investigate unknown samples. However, the best data quality was achieved by prm-PASEF, owing to the focus on fragmentation of specified targets. The high selectivity and sensitivity in generating MS/MS spectra of prm-PASEF could be a potential alternative for targeted lipidomics, e.g., in clinical applications.
基于离子淌度质谱(TIMS)的平行累积-串行碎裂(PASEF)方法与传统的 MS/MS 实验相比,能够在相同的时间段内实现基于淌度分辨的碎裂,并产生更多的碎片。此外,离子淌度维度为碎裂提供了新的方法。通过平行反应监测(prm),离子淌度维度允许更准确地选择前体窗口,而使用数据非依赖性采集(dia)则通过离子淌度过滤来提高谱图质量。由于在蛋白质组学中易于实现,这些 PASEF 模式在脂质组学中的可转移性引起了极大的兴趣,特别是由于具有相似片段的分析物的高度复杂性。然而,这些新型 PASEF 模式尚未在脂质组学应用中得到全面评估。因此,使用亲水作用色谱(HILIC)对人血浆样品中的磷脂类别进行分离,比较了数据依赖采集(dda)、dia 和 prm-PASEF。结果表明,所有三种 PASEF 模式通常都适用于脂质组学。尽管 dia-PASEF 在生成 MS/MS 谱图方面具有高灵敏度,但对于具有相似保留时间和离子淌度的脂质,进行碎片与前体的分配却很困难。因此,dda-PASEF 是用于研究未知样品的首选方法。然而,prm-PASEF 实现了最佳的数据质量,这是由于其专注于特定目标的碎裂。prm-PASEF 生成 MS/MS 谱图的高选择性和灵敏度可能是靶向脂质组学的潜在替代方法,例如在临床应用中。