• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测古地磁记录中的地磁场极性。

Detecting dipolarity of the geomagnetic field in the paleomagnetic record.

机构信息

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet, 80333 Munich, Germany.

Geophysical Observatory Borok, Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yaroslavl Oblast, 151742 Borok, Russia.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2220887120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220887120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2220887120
PMID:37307474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10288625/
Abstract

Recovering the geomagnetic field strength in the past is key to understanding deep Earth dynamics and detecting potential geodynamo regimes throughout the history of Earth. To better constrain the predictive power of the paleomagnetic record, we propose an approach based on the analysis of the dependency between geomagnetic field strength and inclination (angle made by the horizontal with the field lines). Based on the outcomes of statistical field models, we show that these two quantities should correlate for a wide range of Earth-like magnetic fields, even with enhanced secular variation, persistent nonzonal components, and severe noise contamination. Focusing on the paleomagnetic record, we show that the correlation is not significant for the Brunhes polarity chron, what we ascribe to inadequate spatiotemporal sampling. In contrast, the correlation is significant for the 1 to 130 Ma interval, whereas it only marginally succeeds prior to 130 Ma when strict filters on both paleointensities and paleodirections are applied. As we cannot detect significant variations in the strength of the correlation over the 1 to 130 Ma interval, we conclude that the Cretaceous Normal Superchron may not be associated with enhanced dipolarity of the geodynamo. The strong correlation obtained prior to 130 Ma when strict filters are applied indicates that the ancient field may not be on average so different from the present-day field. If long-term fluctuations nevertheless existed, detecting potential geodynamo regimes during the Precambrian is currently impeded by the sparsity of high-quality data passing strict filters in both paleointensities and paleodirections.

摘要

恢复过去的地磁场强度对于理解地球深部动力学以及检测地球历史上潜在的地发电机状态至关重要。为了更好地约束古地磁记录的预测能力,我们提出了一种基于地磁场强度与倾斜(磁场线与水平面之间的夹角)之间依赖关系分析的方法。基于统计场模型的结果,我们表明这两个量应该在广泛的类地磁场范围内相关联,即使存在增强的长期变化、持续的非纬向分量和严重的噪声污染。关注古地磁记录,我们发现 Brunhes 极性时期的相关性不显著,我们将其归因于时空采样不足。相比之下,1 到 130 Ma 之间的相关性显著,而在应用严格的古强度和古方向滤波器之前,该相关性在 130 Ma 之前仅略有成功。由于我们无法检测到 1 到 130 Ma 之间相关性强度的显著变化,因此我们得出结论,白垩纪正常超静磁期可能与地发电机的偶极增强无关。在应用严格滤波器时,在 130 Ma 之前获得的强相关性表明,古磁场平均而言与现代磁场并没有太大的不同。如果确实存在长期波动,那么在古元古代检测潜在的地发电机状态目前受到通过严格滤波器的高质量数据在古强度和古方向上的稀疏性的阻碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/26faf2391d61/pnas.2220887120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/12bea37a3970/pnas.2220887120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/a32d0d1f1043/pnas.2220887120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/26faf2391d61/pnas.2220887120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/12bea37a3970/pnas.2220887120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/a32d0d1f1043/pnas.2220887120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/10288625/26faf2391d61/pnas.2220887120fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Detecting dipolarity of the geomagnetic field in the paleomagnetic record.检测古地磁记录中的地磁场极性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2220887120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220887120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Weaker axially dipolar time-averaged paleomagnetic field based on multidomain-corrected paleointensities from Galapagos lavas.基于加拉帕戈斯熔岩多畴校正古强度的较弱轴向偶极时间平均古地磁场。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):15036-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505450112. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
The Cretaceous superchron geodynamo: observations near the tangent cylinder.白垩纪超长期地磁发电机:切圆柱附近的观测
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14020-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222373499. Epub 2002 Oct 18.
4
High geomagnetic intensity during the mid-Cretaceous from Thellier analyses of single plagioclase crystals.通过对单个斜长石晶体的泰利埃分析得出白垩纪中期的高地磁强度。
Science. 2001 Mar 2;291(5509):1779-83. doi: 10.1126/science.1057519.
5
Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field: Evidence for a Mid-Paleozoic dipole low.地球磁场强度:中古生代偶极子低值的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 24;118(34). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017342118.
6
Late Cambrian geomagnetic instability after the onset of inner core nucleation.内核成核开始后的晚寒武世地磁不稳定。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 31;14(1):4596. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40309-7.
7
Authigenic Be/Be ratio signatures of the cosmogenic nuclide production linked to geomagnetic dipole moment variation since the Brunhes/Matuyama boundary.自布容/松山界限以来与地磁偶极矩变化相关的宇宙成因核素产生的自生铍/铍比率特征。
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2016 Nov;121(11):7716-7741. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013335. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
Paleosecular variation recorded by Quaternary lava flows from Guadeloupe Island.由瓜德罗普岛第四纪熔岩流记录的古气候旋回变化。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 5;8(1):10147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28384-z.
9
Palaeomagnetism of the Upper Miocene- Lower Pliocene lavas from the East Carpathians: contribution to the paleosecular variation of geomagnetic field.东喀尔巴阡山上新世晚期 - 上新世早期熔岩的古地磁学:对地球磁场古长期变化的贡献
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 21;6:23411. doi: 10.1038/srep23411.
10
Paleomagnetism indicates that primary magnetite in zircon records a strong Hadean geodynamo.古地磁学表明,锆石中的原生磁铁矿记录了强烈的太古宙地磁场。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2309-2318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916553117. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
High geomagnetic field intensity recorded by anorthosite xenoliths requires a strongly powered late Mesoproterozoic geodynamo.斜长岩捕虏体记录的高磁场强度要求一个强动力的中-新元古代地球发电机。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 19;119(29):e2202875119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202875119. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Early Cambrian renewal of the geodynamo and the origin of inner core structure.早寒武世地磁场的重启与内核结构的起源。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 19;13(1):4161. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31677-7.
3
Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field: Evidence for a Mid-Paleozoic dipole low.
地球磁场强度:中古生代偶极子低值的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 24;118(34). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017342118.
4
Palaeomagnetic field intensity variations suggest Mesoproterozoic inner-core nucleation.古地磁场强度变化表明中元古代内核的形成。
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):245-8. doi: 10.1038/nature15523.
5
The Cretaceous superchron geodynamo: observations near the tangent cylinder.白垩纪超长期地磁发电机:切圆柱附近的观测
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14020-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222373499. Epub 2002 Oct 18.
6
High geomagnetic intensity during the mid-Cretaceous from Thellier analyses of single plagioclase crystals.通过对单个斜长石晶体的泰利埃分析得出白垩纪中期的高地磁强度。
Science. 2001 Mar 2;291(5509):1779-83. doi: 10.1126/science.1057519.