• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下真空治疗与其他治疗方法治疗上消化道漏的长期生活质量结局比较。

Comparison of long-term quality of life outcomes between endoscopic vacuum therapy and other treatments for upper gastrointestinal leaks.

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, 3417 Gaston Avenue, Suite 965, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.

Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6538-6547. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10181-z. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10181-z
PMID:37308758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While endoscopic vacuum assisted closure (EVAC) therapy is a validated treatment for gastrointestinal leaks, its impact on long-term quality of life (QoL) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of successful EVAC management on long-term QoL outcomes.

METHODS

An institutional review board approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients undergoing treatment for gastrointestinal leaks between June 2012 and July 2022. The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) survey was used to assess QoL. Patients were contacted by telephone and sent the survey electronically. QoL outcomes between patients who underwent successful EVAC therapy and those who required conventional treatment (CT) were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (17 EVAC; 27 CT) completed the survey and were included in our analysis. All included patients had foregut leaks with sleeve gastrectomy being the most common sentinel operation (n = 20). The mean time from the sentinel operation was 3.8 years and 4.8 years for the EVAC and CT groups, respectively. When evaluating long-term QoL, the EVAC group scored higher in all QoL domains when compared to the CT group with physical functioning (87.3 vs 69.3, p = 0.04), role limitations due to physical health (84.1 vs 45.7, p = 0.02), energy/fatigue (60.0 vs 40.9, p = 0.04), and social functioning (86.2 vs 64.1, p = 0.04) reaching statistical significance. Overall, patients who achieved organ preservation via successful EVAC therapy scored higher in all domains with role limitations due to physical health (p = 0.04) being statistically significant. In a multivariable regression analysis, increased age and a history of prior abdominal surgery at the time of the sentinel operation were patient characteristics that negatively impacted QoL outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with gastrointestinal leaks successfully managed by EVAC therapy have better long-term QoL outcomes when compared to patients undergoing other treatments.

摘要

背景

虽然内镜下真空辅助闭合(EVAC)治疗是一种经过验证的胃肠道漏治疗方法,但它对长期生活质量(QoL)的影响尚不确定。本研究的目的是评估成功 EVAC 管理对长期 QoL 结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了一家机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性维护数据库,以确定 2012 年 6 月至 2022 年 7 月期间接受胃肠道漏治疗的患者。采用简短 36 项健康调查量表(SF-36)评估 QoL。通过电话联系患者并通过电子邮件向其发送调查。分析并比较了接受成功 EVAC 治疗的患者和需要常规治疗(CT)的患者的 QoL 结果。

结果

共有 44 名患者(EVAC 组 17 例,CT 组 27 例)完成了调查并纳入我们的分析。所有纳入的患者均有前肠漏,其中袖状胃切除术是最常见的哨兵手术(n=20)。EVAC 组和 CT 组从哨兵手术到接受治疗的平均时间分别为 3.8 年和 4.8 年。在评估长期 QoL 时,与 CT 组相比,EVAC 组在所有 QoL 领域的得分均更高,包括身体功能(87.3 对 69.3,p=0.04)、因身体健康受限的角色功能(84.1 对 45.7,p=0.02)、精力/疲劳(60.0 对 40.9,p=0.04)和社会功能(86.2 对 64.1,p=0.04),均具有统计学意义。总体而言,通过成功 EVAC 治疗保留器官的患者在所有领域的得分更高,其中因身体健康受限的角色功能差异具有统计学意义(p=0.04)。在多变量回归分析中,年龄增加和哨兵手术时存在既往腹部手术史是影响 QoL 结局的患者特征。

结论

与接受其他治疗的患者相比,成功接受 EVAC 治疗的胃肠道漏患者具有更好的长期 QoL 结局。

相似文献

1
Comparison of long-term quality of life outcomes between endoscopic vacuum therapy and other treatments for upper gastrointestinal leaks.内镜下真空治疗与其他治疗方法治疗上消化道漏的长期生活质量结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6538-6547. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10181-z. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Endoscopic vacuum assisted wound closure (EVAC) device to treat esophageal and gastric leaks: assessing time to proficiency and cost.内镜下真空辅助伤口闭合(EVAC)装置治疗食管和胃瘘:评估熟练掌握时间和成本。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3970-3975. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06685-2. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience.使用腔内负压治疗胃肠道漏的新技术:单机构经验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3349-3356. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6055-x. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Factors that promote successful endoscopic management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leaks.促进腹腔镜袖状胃切除术漏管内镜成功管理的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4638-4643. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07890-0. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Efficacy of Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure Treatment for Postoperative Anastomotic Leak in Gastric Cancer.内镜下真空辅助闭合治疗胃癌术后吻合口漏的疗效。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):746-754. doi: 10.5009/gnl20114.
6
Endoscopic Esophageal Vacuum Therapy: A Novel Therapy for Esophageal Perforations in Pediatric Patients.经内镜食管真空治疗:小儿食管穿孔的一种新疗法。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Dec;67(6):706-712. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002073.
7
Endoscopic vacuum therapy significantly improves clinical outcomes of anastomotic leakages after 2-stage, 3-stage, and transhiatal esophagectomies.内镜下真空治疗显著改善了 2 期、3 期和经食管裂孔食管切除术吻合口漏的临床转归。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 15;408(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02826-3.
8
Modified Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Nonhealing Esophageal Anastomotic Leak: Technique Description and Review of Literature.改良内镜下真空疗法治疗食管吻合口不愈合漏:技术描述及文献综述
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0318. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis.经内镜治疗食管胸腔内瘘:支架与内镜下真空辅助闭合的对比:回顾性分析。
Endoscopy. 2013 Jun;45(6):433-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326435. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
10
Primary and Rescue Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Esophageal Perforations and Leaks.原发性和挽救性腔内负压疗法在食管穿孔和渗漏管理中的应用
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug 20;24(4):173-179. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00107. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Coated poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Phasix ST™) mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair: our institutional experience and review of the literature.涂层聚 4-羟基丁酸酯(Phasix ST™)网片在食管裂孔疝修补术中安全有效:我们的机构经验和文献回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):830-836. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10604-x. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) versus Self-Expandable Metal Stent (SEMS) for Anastomotic Leaks after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下真空治疗(EVT)与自膨式金属支架(SEMS)在上消化道手术后吻合口漏治疗中的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;13(2):287. doi: 10.3390/life13020287.
2
Volume-outcome relationships for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients in the sleeve gastrectomy era.胃旁路术时代行袖状胃切除术患者的容积-结局关系。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3884-3892. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08705-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Safety and effectiveness of endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure for esophageal defects: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
腔内真空辅助闭合术治疗食管缺损的安全性和有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Aug 16;9(9):E1371-E1380. doi: 10.1055/a-1508-5947. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Endoscopic Management of Staple Line Leak after Bariatric Surgery: Surgeon's Perspective.减重手术后吻合口漏的内镜治疗:外科医生的观点
Clin Endosc. 2021 Nov;54(6):805-809. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.298. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Endoscopic internal drainage for the management of leak, fistula, and collection after sleeve gastrectomy: our experience in 617 consecutive patients.内镜下内引流治疗袖状胃切除术后漏、瘘及积液:我们在 617 例连续患者中的经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Aug;17(8):1432-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.胃食管反流病的手术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4095-4123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08358-5. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
Endoscopic Negative Pressure Therapy (ENPT) Is Superior to Stent Therapy for Staple Line Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Cohort Study.内镜负压治疗(ENPT)在袖状胃切除术后吻合口漏的治疗中优于支架治疗:一项单中心队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2511-2519. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05287-z. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
The evolution of surgical treatment for chronic leak following sleeve.袖状胃切除术后慢性渗漏的手术治疗演变。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Feb;17(2):278-283. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
9
Effect of anastomotic leaks on long-term survival after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.吻合口漏对食管癌手术后长期生存的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2021 Mar 8;34(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa085.
10
Endoscopic management of leaks and fistulas after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减重手术后漏口和瘘管的内镜治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1067-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07471-1. Epub 2020 Feb 27.