Richards Dawn P, Poirier Sabrina, Mohabir Vina, Proulx Laurie, Robins Sue, Smith Jeffery
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Five02 Labs Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 12;9(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00454-1.
As six patient partners in Canada, we aim to contribute to learning and to provide an opportunity to reflect on patient engagement (PE) in research and healthcare environments. Patient engagement refers to "meaningful and active collaboration in governance, priority setting, conducting research and knowledge translation" with patient partners as members of teams, rather than participants in research or clinical care. While much has been written about the benefits of patient engagement, it is important to accurately document and share what we term 'patient engagement gone wrong.' These examples have been anonymized and presented as four statements: patient partners as a check mark, unconscious bias towards patient partners, lack of support to fully include patient partners, and lack of recognizing the vulnerability of patient partners. The examples provided are intended to demonstrate that patient engagement gone wrong is more common than discussed openly, and to simply bring this to light. This article is not intending to lay blame, rather to evolve and improve patient engagement initiatives. We ask those who interact with patient partners to reflect so we can all work towards improving patient engagement. Lean into the discomfort with these conversations as that is the only way to change these all too recognizable examples, and which will lead to better project outcomes and experiences for all team members.
作为加拿大的六位患者合作伙伴,我们旨在促进学习,并提供一个机会,以反思患者参与研究和医疗环境的情况。患者参与是指患者合作伙伴作为团队成员在治理、确定优先事项、开展研究和知识转化方面进行“有意义且积极的合作”,而不是作为研究或临床护理的参与者。虽然关于患者参与的益处已有很多论述,但准确记录并分享我们所说的“患者参与出现问题的情况”也很重要。这些例子已进行匿名处理,并呈现为四条陈述:将患者合作伙伴视为形式,对患者合作伙伴存在无意识偏见,缺乏充分纳入患者合作伙伴的支持,以及未认识到患者合作伙伴的脆弱性。所提供的例子旨在表明,患者参与出现问题的情况比公开讨论的更为常见,只是为了揭示这一点。本文并非意在指责,而是为了改进和完善患者参与计划。我们要求与患者合作伙伴互动的人进行反思,以便我们都能努力改善患者参与情况。直面这些对话中的不适,因为这是改变这些极易识别的例子的唯一途径,这将为所有团队成员带来更好的项目成果和体验。