Von Hoff D D, Clark G M, Forseth B J, Cowan J D
Cancer. 1986 Sep 1;58(5):1007-13. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860901)58:5<1007::aid-cncr2820580503>3.0.co;2-#.
A human tumor cloning assay was used to analyze drug sensitivity profiles for 99 pairs of tumor samples taken simultaneously from the same patient. These pairs included two areas of the same primary (12 pairs), primary tumor versus metastasis (29 pairs), and metastasis versus metastasis (45 pairs). In addition, to assess variability in the culture and sensitivity techniques, 13 specimens were divided equally and processed twice. One hundred fourteen evaluable drug sensitivity tests were performed on the specimen pairs. Drug sensitivity profiles for the same specimen processed twice demonstrated good agreement (P = 0.03). Sensitivity profiles from two different areas of the same primary were also quite similar (P = 0.002). However, when one sampled a primary tumor and its metastasis for drug sensitivity testing, the agreement (in terms of percent survival) was poor (P = 0.84). Agreement was also poor for drug sensitivity profiles of one metastasis versus another metastasis (P = 0.39). This heterogeneity in drug sensitivity profiles of primary versus metastasis and of metastasis versus metastasis could account for some of the false positives and false negatives noted in clinical correlation trials with the cloning assay. It may also have implications for adjuvant treatment programs where chemosensitivity of the primary tumor can be determined, but will probably not be predictive for chemosensitivity of the micrometastases.
采用人肿瘤克隆试验分析了从同一患者同时采集的99对肿瘤样本的药敏谱。这些样本对包括同一原发肿瘤的两个区域(12对)、原发肿瘤与转移灶(29对)以及转移灶与转移灶(45对)。此外,为评估培养和药敏技术的变异性,将13个标本平均分成两份并进行了两次处理。对样本对进行了114次可评估的药敏试验。对同一标本进行两次处理得到的药敏谱显示出良好的一致性(P = 0.03)。同一原发肿瘤两个不同区域的药敏谱也非常相似(P = 0.002)。然而,当对原发肿瘤及其转移灶进行药敏测试时,(就生存率而言)一致性较差(P = 0.84)。转移灶与转移灶之间的药敏谱一致性也较差(P = 0.39)。原发肿瘤与转移灶以及转移灶与转移灶之间药敏谱的这种异质性可能是克隆试验临床相关性试验中出现一些假阳性和假阴性结果的部分原因。这也可能对辅助治疗方案产生影响,在辅助治疗方案中可以确定原发肿瘤的化疗敏感性,但可能无法预测微转移灶的化疗敏感性。