Schlag P, Schreml W
Cancer Res. 1982 Oct;42(10):4086-9.
The human tumor colony-forming assay was used to compare primary tumors with their metastases. Cell suspensions were prepared from 38 primary tumors and from metastases taken simultaneously from the same patient. Considerable differences were observed. Cloning efficiency was significantly higher in the cell suspensions taken from metastases than from material from the primary tumor. In 10 paired samples which allowed in vitro drug sensitivity testing, the data showed no satisfactory correlation in resistance of sensitivity to cytostatic drugs between primary tumor and metastases. The regression coefficient calculated for the different cytostatic agents (Adriamycin, bis(chloro)ethylnitrosourea, 5-fluorouracil, 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide) varied between 0.02 and 0.1. The results indicate that experiments designed to analyze chemosensitivity of tumor cells in the tumor colony-forming assay should be interpreted with caution. In particular, in vitro sensitivity data obtained from the primary tumor may have severe limitations in planning treatment of metastatic disease.
采用人肿瘤集落形成试验比较原发性肿瘤与其转移灶。从38例原发性肿瘤以及同时取自同一患者的转移灶制备细胞悬液。观察到显著差异。取自转移灶的细胞悬液中的克隆效率明显高于取自原发性肿瘤组织的细胞悬液。在10对可进行体外药物敏感性测试的样本中,数据显示原发性肿瘤与转移灶在对细胞毒性药物的耐药性或敏感性方面没有令人满意的相关性。针对不同细胞毒性药物(阿霉素、双(氯)乙基亚硝脲、5-氟尿嘧啶、4-羟基过氧环磷酰胺)计算的回归系数在0.02至0.1之间。结果表明,旨在通过肿瘤集落形成试验分析肿瘤细胞化学敏感性的实验应谨慎解读。特别是,从原发性肿瘤获得的体外敏感性数据在规划转移性疾病的治疗时可能有严重局限性。