Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗周期数是否影响局部晚期非小细胞肺癌新辅助化免治疗的疗效?基于单中心的回顾性经验。

Does the number of cycles of neoadjuvant therapy affect the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer in locally advanced stage? Retrospective experience based on a single center.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct;20(5):643-651. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13971. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of cycles of neoadjuvant therapy programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial.

METHODS

From October 2019 to March 2022, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by radical surgery for NSCLC patients with stage II-III were retrospectively reviewed in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. The radiologic response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. The major pathological response was defined as no more than 10% residual tumor. Student's t-test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney test were used for univariate analysis, logistic regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. All statistical analyses were calculated by SPSS software (version 26).

RESULTS

Among 108 patients, the number of patients who received 2-cycle (2-cycle group) and more than 2-cycle (>2-cycle group) neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were 75 (69.4%) and 33 (30.6%), respectively. Compared with patients in the >2-cycle group, patients in the 2-cycle group had significantly smaller diagnostic radiological tumor size (37.0 mm vs. 49.6 mm, p = 0.022) and radiological tumor regression rate (36% vs. 49%, p = 0.007). However, no significant difference in pathological tumor regression rate was observed between patients in the 2-cycle group and >2-cycle group. Further logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle could independently affect the radiographic response (odds ratio [OR]: 0.173, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.051-0.584, p = 0.005) but not for pathological response (OR: 0.450, 95% CI: 0.161-1.257, p = 0.127).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients diagnosed with stage II-III NSCLC, the number of neoadjuvant cycles administered can significantly influence the radiographic efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy.

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗程序性死亡受体 1(PD-1)抑制剂的周期数用于局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)仍存在争议。

方法

2019 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月,回顾性分析上海肺科医院接受 II-III 期 NSCLC 新辅助化疗免疫联合治疗后行根治性手术的患者。根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 评估影像学反应。主要病理反应定义为残留肿瘤不超过 10%。采用 Student's t 检验、卡方检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验进行单因素分析,采用 logistic 回归分析进行多因素分析。所有统计分析均采用 SPSS 软件(版本 26)进行计算。

结果

在 108 例患者中,接受 2 个周期(2 周期组)和 2 个周期以上(>2 周期组)新辅助化疗免疫治疗的患者分别为 75 例(69.4%)和 33 例(30.6%)。与>2 周期组患者相比,2 周期组患者的诊断影像学肿瘤大小明显较小(37.0mm 比 49.6mm,p=0.022),影像学肿瘤消退率较高(36%比 49%,p=0.007)。然而,2 周期组和>2 周期组患者的病理肿瘤消退率无显著差异。进一步的 logistic 回归分析表明,新辅助化疗免疫治疗周期可独立影响影像学反应(比值比[OR]:0.173,95%置信区间[CI]:0.051-0.584,p=0.005),但对病理反应无影响(OR:0.450,95%CI:0.161-1.257,p=0.127)。

结论

对于诊断为 II-III 期 NSCLC 的患者,新辅助周期数可显著影响化疗免疫治疗的影像学疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验