Wang Yuchen, Ma Xiaobo, Ma Kewei, Chen Xi, He Hua, Zhao Xiangye, Fan Mengge, Xu Yinghui
Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Pathological Department, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 17;15:1479263. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1479263. eCollection 2024.
Treatment of locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant challenge, especially for patients with IIIA/IIIB NSCLC. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI) show improved pathological responses and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to those receiving Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). However, there is still no consensus on the treatment for potentially resectable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC.
This retrospective study included 71 patients newly diagnosed with stage III NSCLC at our institution between 2017 and 2023: 46 patients received NCI and 25 patients received NC followed by surgical resection. Their clinicopathological characteristics were reviewed and analyzed.
Patients who received NCI had a significantly longer DFS. The median DFS was 15 months in the NC group (hazard ratio: 0.186, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 0.073-0.479; <0.001) but had not been reached in the NCI group. The percentage of patients achieving a major pathologic response was 65.9% (29/44, 95% CI: 50.0%-79.1%) with NCI and 16.7% (4/24, 95% CI: 5.5%-38.2%) with NC alone(<0.001). The percentage of patients with pathologic complete response was 36.4% (16/44, 95% CI: 22.8%-52.3%) after NCI compared with 8.3% (2/24, 95% CI: 1.5%-28.5%) after NC ( = 0.012). The survival curve shows that the overall survival for the NCI group has a better trend than that of the NC group, but there is no significant difference (=0.193). The incidence of all-grade adverse events was greater in the NCI group than in the NC group (80.4% vs. 64.0%). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 10.9% (n=5) and 8.0% (n=2), respectively; however, these differences were insignificant.
NCI is more effective and safer for patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC. Compared with NC alone, NCI significantly improves the pathological response and DFS without increasing adverse events.
局部晚期不可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗是一项重大挑战,尤其是对于IIIA/IIIB期NSCLC患者。与接受新辅助化疗(NC)的患者相比,接受新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗(NCI)的患者显示出更好的病理反应和无病生存期(DFS)。然而,对于潜在可切除的IIIA/IIIB期NSCLC的治疗仍未达成共识。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2017年至2023年间在我院新诊断为III期NSCLC的71例患者:46例患者接受NCI,25例患者接受NC后进行手术切除。对他们的临床病理特征进行了回顾和分析。
接受NCI的患者DFS显著更长。NC组的中位DFS为15个月(风险比:0.186,95%置信区间[CI]:0.073 - 0.479;<0.001),而NCI组尚未达到。NCI组达到主要病理反应的患者百分比为65.9%(29/44,95% CI:50.0% - 79.1%),单纯NC组为16.7%(4/24,95% CI:5.5% - 38.2%)(<0.001)。NCI后病理完全缓解的患者百分比为36.4%(16/44,95% CI:22.8% - 52.3%),而NC后为8.3%(2/24,95% CI:1.5% - 28.5%)(P = 0.012)。生存曲线显示NCI组的总生存趋势优于NC组,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.193)。NCI组所有级别的不良事件发生率高于NC组(80.4%对64.0%)。≥3级不良事件的发生率分别为10.9%(n = 5)和8.0%(n = 2);然而,这些差异无统计学意义。
对于潜在可切除的IIIA/IIIB期NSCLC患者,NCI更有效且更安全。与单纯NC相比,NCI显著改善了病理反应和DFS,且未增加不良事件。