• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱注册研究的质量控制:新方案的制定与应用。

Quality Control for Spine Registries: Development and Application of a New Protocol.

机构信息

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, RWTH Uniklinik Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2023;38(4):181-187. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000128. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000128
PMID:37314237
Abstract

Registries are gaining importance both in clinical practice and for research purposes. However, quality control is paramount to ensure that data are consistent and reliable. Quality control protocols have been proposed for arthroplasty registries, but these are not directly applicable to the spine setting. This study aims to develop a new quality control protocol for spine registries. Based on the available protocols for arthroplasty registries, a new protocol for spine registries was developed. The items included in the protocol were completeness (yearly enrollment rate and rate of assessment completion), consistency, and internal validity (coherence between registry data and medical records for blood loss, body mass index, and treated levels). All aspects were then applied to the spine registry of the Institution to verify its quality for each of the 5 years in which the registry has been used (2016-2020). Regarding completeness, the yearly enrollment rate ranged from 78 to 86%; the completion of preoperative assessment from 79% to 100%. The yearly consistency rate varied from 83% to 86%. Considering internal validity, the interclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.1 to 0.8 for blood loss and from 0.3 to 0.9 for body mass index. The coherency for treated levels ranged from 25% to 82%. Overall, all 3 items showed an improvement over time. All 3 analyzed domains showed good to excellent results. The overall quality of the registered data improved over time.

摘要

登记处无论在临床实践还是研究目的方面都变得越来越重要。然而,为了确保数据的一致性和可靠性,质量控制至关重要。已经为关节置换登记处提出了质量控制协议,但这些协议不适用于脊柱环境。本研究旨在为脊柱登记处开发新的质量控制协议。在现有的关节置换登记处协议的基础上,为脊柱登记处开发了一个新的协议。该协议中包含的项目包括完整性(每年的入组率和评估完成率)、一致性和内部有效性(登记处数据与病历中失血量、体重指数和治疗水平之间的一致性)。然后,将所有方面应用于该机构的脊柱登记处,以验证其在使用该登记处的 5 年中的每一年的质量(2016-2020 年)。关于完整性,每年的入组率从 78%到 86%不等;术前评估的完成率从 79%到 100%不等。每年的一致性率从 83%到 86%不等。考虑到内部有效性,失血量的组内相关系数从 0.1 到 0.8 不等,体重指数从 0.3 到 0.9 不等。治疗水平的一致性从 25%到 82%不等。总体而言,所有 3 项指标均随时间推移而改善。所有 3 个分析领域均取得了良好到优秀的结果。注册数据的整体质量随时间推移而提高。

相似文献

1
Quality Control for Spine Registries: Development and Application of a New Protocol.脊柱注册研究的质量控制:新方案的制定与应用。
Am J Med Qual. 2023;38(4):181-187. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000128. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Completeness and accuracy of data in spine registries: an independent audit-based study.脊柱注册研究中数据的完整性和准确性:一项基于独立审核的研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jun;29(6):1453-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06342-6. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results.机构关节置换登记处的数据质量:验证模型描述及初步结果报告
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2065-2069. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.030. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
4
Clinical epidemiological studies of women undergoing surgery for urogynaecological disorders.接受泌尿妇科疾病手术治疗的女性的临床流行病学研究。
Dan Med J. 2015 Oct;62(10):B5154.
5
The fate of prospective spine studies registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov.在www.ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的前瞻性脊柱研究的命运。
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
6
Quality registry improves the data of chronic ulcers: Validation of Tampere Wound Registry.质量登记册提高慢性溃疡数据质量:坦佩雷伤口登记册的验证。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3750-3759. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14270. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Data Reliability and Coding Completeness of Cancer Registry Information Using Reabstracting Method in the National Cancer Institute: Thailand, 2012 to 2014.2012年至2014年泰国国家癌症研究所采用再摘要法对癌症登记信息的数据可靠性和编码完整性研究
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-9. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00147.
8
The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012.国家心血管数据注册(NCDR)数据质量简报:2012 年 NCDR 数据质量计划。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 16;60(16):1484-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.020. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
9
Patient reported outcomes in hip arthroplasty registries.髋关节置换登记系统中的患者报告结局
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4845.
10
Task-independent metrics to assess the data quality of medical registries using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database.使用欧洲胸外科协会(ESTS)数据库评估医疗注册数据质量的任务无关指标。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 17.