London School of Economics & Political Science and Bank of England, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0286273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286273. eCollection 2023.
There is ongoing debate about whether the relationship between income and pro-social behaviour depends on economic inequality. Studies investigating this question differ in their conclusions but are consistent in measuring inequality at aggregated geographic levels (i.e. at the state, region, or country-level). I hypothesise that local, more immediate manifestations of inequality are important for driving pro-social behaviour, and test the interaction between income and inequality at a much finer geographical resolution than previous studies. I first analyse the charitable giving of US households using ZIP-code level measures of inequality and data on tax deductible charitable donations reported to the IRS. I then examine whether the results generalise using a large-scale UK household survey and neighbourhood-level inequality measures. In both samples I find robust evidence of a significant interaction effect, albeit in the opposite direction as that which has been previously postulated-higher income individuals behave more pro-socially rather than less when local inequality is high.
关于收入与亲社会行为之间的关系是否取决于经济不平等,目前仍存在争议。研究这个问题的研究结果存在差异,但在衡量不平等时都一致地采用了聚合地理层面的指标(即州、地区或国家层面)。我假设,地方层面、更直接的不平等现象对推动亲社会行为很重要,并以比以往研究更为精细的地理分辨率来检验收入与不平等之间的相互作用。我首先使用不平等的 ZIP 编码水平衡量标准以及向 IRS 报告的可减税慈善捐赠数据,分析了美国家庭的慈善捐赠情况。然后,我使用一项大规模的英国家庭调查和邻里不平等衡量标准,来检验结果是否具有普遍性。在两个样本中,我都发现了一个显著的相互作用效应的有力证据,尽管与之前提出的假设方向相反——当当地不平等程度较高时,高收入个体的亲社会行为表现更为明显,而不是更为减少。