Department of Sociology, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016;
Department of Political Science, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9593-9598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706253114. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Economic inequality has been on the rise in the United States since the 1980s and by some measures stands at levels not seen since before the Great Depression. Although the strikingly high and rising level of economic inequality in the nation has alarmed scholars, pundits, and elected officials alike, research across the social sciences repeatedly concludes that Americans are largely unconcerned about it. Considerable research has documented, for instance, the important role of psychological processes, such as system justification and American Dream ideology, in engendering Americans' relative insensitivity to economic inequality. The present work offers, and reports experimental tests of, a different perspective-the opportunity model of beliefs about economic inequality. Specifically, two convenience samples (study 1, = 480; and study 2, = 1,305) and one representative sample (study 3, = 1,501) of American adults were exposed to information about rising economic inequality in the United States (or control information) and then asked about their beliefs regarding the roles of structural (e.g., being born wealthy) and individual (e.g., hard work) factors in getting ahead in society (i.e., opportunity beliefs). They then responded to policy questions regarding the roles of business and government actors in reducing economic inequality. Rather than revealing insensitivity to rising inequality, the results suggest that rising economic inequality in contemporary society can spark skepticism about the existence of economic opportunity in society that, in turn, may motivate support for policies designed to redress economic inequality.
自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,美国的经济不平等一直在加剧,从某些衡量标准来看,这一水平已经达到了大萧条前未曾有过的程度。尽管美国国内经济不平等程度之高、且不断上升的状况令学者、专家和政府官员都感到震惊,但社会科学领域的多项研究却反复得出结论,称美国人对此基本上漠不关心。例如,大量研究记录了心理过程(如系统合理化和美国梦意识形态)在导致美国人对经济不平等相对不敏感方面所起的重要作用。本研究提出并报告了一个不同的视角,即关于经济不平等的信念的机会模型的实验测试。具体来说,两个方便样本(研究 1,n=480;研究 2,n=1305)和一个代表性样本(研究 3,n=1501)的美国成年人接触到了有关美国经济不平等加剧的信息(或控制信息),然后被问及他们对结构因素(例如,出生富裕)和个人因素(例如,努力工作)在社会中取得成功的作用的信念(即机会信念)。然后,他们对有关商业和政府在减少经济不平等方面的作用的政策问题做出了回应。结果表明,与人们对不平等加剧的漠不关心相反,当代社会经济不平等的加剧可能会引发人们对社会经济机会是否存在的怀疑,而这种怀疑反过来又可能促使人们支持旨在缓解经济不平等的政策。