Glass N R, Stillman R M, Butt K M, Kountz S L
Surgery. 1979 May;85(5):504-8.
In order to determine the results of transplantation using pediatric cadaver donors, a retrospective analysis of a series of 502 renal transplant recipients was carried out. Methods of procurement, preservation, recipient selection, and immunosuppressive regimen were similar for all patients. Sixty-five recipients were approximately equally divided into three groups whose donors were younger than 5 years of age, 6 to 10 years old, and 11 to 15 years. These three groups then were compared with each other and to a randomly selected representative group of recipients whose donors were adults (16 years or older) for the following parameters: actuarial graft and patient survival, causes of graft failure and patient death, level of serum creatinine in currently functioning grafts, and recipient age. There were no statistically significant differences between groups for any parameter except that the mean age of recipients was approximately 16 years for the donors up to 5 years of age and was between 31 and 36 years for the other donor age groups (P = 0.01). These results support the contention that brain-dead pediatric patients of any age should be considered to be potential cadaveric kidney donors. Exclusion of these patients is very wasteful and also is unnecessary since results of transplantation equal to those obtained with adult donors can be expected. Technical graft failures should not be more frequent than with adult kidneys, and there is no need to modify the basic surgical technique for small kidneys in order to achieve this.
为了确定使用小儿尸体供体进行移植的结果,对502例肾移植受者进行了回顾性分析。所有患者的获取、保存、受者选择和免疫抑制方案方法相似。65名受者大致平均分为三组,其供体年龄分别小于5岁、6至10岁和11至15岁。然后将这三组相互比较,并与随机选择的供体为成年人(16岁及以上)的受者代表组进行以下参数比较:移植精算生存率和患者生存率、移植失败和患者死亡原因、当前功能正常的移植肾的血清肌酐水平以及受者年龄。除了供体年龄小于5岁的受者平均年龄约为16岁,其他供体年龄组的受者平均年龄在31至36岁之间外(P = 0.01),各参数在组间无统计学显著差异。这些结果支持以下观点,即任何年龄的脑死亡小儿患者都应被视为潜在的尸体肾供体。将这些患者排除在外非常浪费,而且也没有必要,因为可以预期移植结果与成年供体的结果相当。技术上的移植失败不应比成年肾更频繁,并且无需为小肾脏修改基本手术技术以实现这一点。