Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Toxicologic Pathology Associates, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2023 Sep;91:105630. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105630. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
Skin permeation is a primary consideration in the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients, topical drugs, and human users handling veterinary medicinal products. While excised human skin (EHS) remains the 'gold standard' for in vitro permeation testing (IVPT) studies, unreliable supply and high cost motivate the search for alternative skin barrier models. In this study, a standardized dermal absorption testing protocol was developed to evaluate the suitability of alternative skin barrier models to predict skin absorption in humans. Under this protocol, side-by-side assessments of a commercially available reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) model (EpiDerm-200-X, MatTek), a synthetic barrier membrane (Strat-M, Sigma-Aldrich), and EHS were performed. The skin barrier models were mounted on Franz diffusion cells and the permeation of caffeine, salicylic acid, and testosterone was quantified. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and histology of the biological models were also compared. EpiDerm-200-X exhibited native human epidermis-like morphology, including a characteristic stratum corneum, but had an elevated TEWL as compared to EHS. The mean 6 h cumulative permeation of a finite dose (6 nmol/cm) of caffeine and testosterone was highest in EpiDerm-200-X, followed by EHS and Strat-M. Salicylic acid permeated most in EHS, followed by EpiDerm-200-X and Strat-M. Overall, evaluating novel alternative skin barrier models in the manner outlined herein has the potential to reduce the time from basic science discovery to regulatory impact.
皮肤渗透是化妆品成分、局部用药物和接触兽用药品的人类使用者的安全性评估中的一个主要考虑因素。虽然离体人皮肤 (EHS) 仍然是体外渗透测试 (IVPT) 研究的“金标准”,但其供应不可靠且成本高昂,这促使人们寻找替代皮肤屏障模型。在这项研究中,制定了标准化的皮肤吸收测试方案,以评估替代皮肤屏障模型预测人体皮肤吸收的适用性。在该方案下,对市售的重建人表皮模型 (EpiDerm-200-X,MatTek)、合成屏障膜 (Strat-M,Sigma-Aldrich) 和 EHS 进行了并排评估。将皮肤屏障模型安装在 Franz 扩散池中,并定量测定咖啡因、水杨酸和睾酮的渗透。还比较了生物模型的经皮水分损失 (TEWL) 和组织学。EpiDerm-200-X 表现出类似于天然人表皮的形态,包括特征性的角质层,但与 EHS 相比,TEWL 升高。有限剂量 (6 nmol/cm) 的咖啡因和睾酮 6 小时累积渗透量以 EpiDerm-200-X 最高,其次是 EHS 和 Strat-M。水杨酸在 EHS 中的渗透最多,其次是 EpiDerm-200-X 和 Strat-M。总的来说,以本文所述的方式评估新型替代皮肤屏障模型有可能缩短从基础科学发现到监管影响的时间。